What about different mechanisms? I think we have rules where the officer CAN do
it by announcement, but everyone else needs CONSENT.
Gaelan
> On Jan 29, 2020, at 1:49 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business
> <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 18:03, Jason Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I submit the following proposal:
>>
>> Title: Deputisation timeliness
>>
>> AI: 3
>>
>> Author: Jason Cobb
>>
>> Co-authors: Alexis
>>
>> {
>>
>> Amend Rule 2160 to read, in whole:
>>
>> {
>>
>> A player acting as emself (the deputy) CAN perform an action ordinarily
>> reserved for an office-holder as if e held the office if
>>
>> 1. the player does not hold that office;
>>
>
> I have two other suggestions after thinking about how to reduce Cyan
> Ribbon shenanigans and make it a more interesting thing to obtain that
> genuinely requires working the officer's duties. First, make it so that a
> player cannot have held the office in the preceding 14 days either; this
> gives a space for another player to take the office so that a player cannot
> immediately unresign and, more importantly, prevents a player from
> resigning an office then immediately deputizing back into it for a Cyan
> Ribbon. Suggested wording "The player has not at any point in the last 14
> days held the office."
>
>>
>> 2. it would be POSSIBLE for the deputy to perform the action, other than
>> by deputisation, if e held the office;
>>
>
> Second, make it so that the person must not be already able to perform the
> action. Suggested wording: "it would be POSSIBLE for the deputy to perform
> the action, other than by deputisation, if e held the office, and, except
> where the action is to publish information, would not be possible
> otherwise;"
>
> -Alexis
