On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 12:10, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
<agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Unless I'm misreading your suggestion, wouldn't this leave us open to saying
> weeks/months/years later, if a deep error turns up, "since that result was
> posted incorrectly, we've been playing under the wrong rules for a while"?

I agree. But the kernel of the idea, of providing an accurate time of
resolution, is good. Currently, the following sequence is a problem:

- There is an incorrect CoE made against a resolution.
- The Assessor accepts it.
- The Assessor posts a new resolution, which self-ratifies.

The first resolution is correct and platnoically succeeds. The CoE
does not interfere with this. The second resolution then ratifies the
resolution again, possibly even adopting the proposal a second time.
If it does not, there's uncertainty as to when it was resolved. But
the core of Falsifian's idea it seem is that the resolution time is
fixed upon the first attempt, and CoEs about the result only address
what the result was, platonically, at the time of the resolution.

I don't have time to draft a fix for this, though, as it seems
relatively involved at first blush, since it requires separating out
the various pieces of a resolution. Likely, we need something along
the lines of making the decisions existence self-ratify, as well as
the statement that its voting period has ended (an important oversight
in the existing things ratified), and that it was resolved in this
message. Then, separately, we have the statement of outcome
self-ratify, as well as separate requirements for posting a tally,
even if incorrect. And then we need to make sure that CoEs against
these things work correctly.

There's a much bigger issue I just nocied, though, and that I do have
enough time to draft as I've already circulated a proto-proto and it's
of smaller scope. I would like to get it out soon, so I will circulate
a proto for that in hopes of being able to get it into this week's
distribution (and note to the Promotor, I am prepared to distribute it
myself via Manifesto, so don't worry about having to hold off if it's
especially inconvenient to you).

-Alexis

Reply via email to