On 3/24/2020 8:27 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
>
> Gratuitous arguments in CFJ 7:
>
This is well-written and reasonable, but (even if only in the spirit of
devil's advocate) here's a simple counterargument:
The important bit of R112 reads:
The state of affairs that constitutes winning may not be altered
from achieving n points to any other state of affairs.
This gives the strong implication that, at initiation, the "state of
affairs that constitutes winning" is solely achieving n points, and for
that to be true, the rules must be "born" in a state in which R112
overrules R219.
