> > Might be better to make that consent conditional on the promise being > > cashed? I can't think of a plausible situation in which it could > > matter, but here's a contrived situation. Suppose I create a promise > > saying I become a candidate for the election for some office. That > > might count as consent to be made the holder of the office under > > R1006, but probably shouldn't unless the promise actually gets cashed. > > Fair point. How about "By creating a promise, a person consents to it > being carried out when it is cashed"?
Yes, I think that would take care of it. - Falsifian
