> > I had been under the impression that the current case of CFJ 3831 is > > sort of like that, since I don't remember people disagreeing with the > > judgement until somewhat later. > > Yes the main issue was there wasn't a peep of complaint for the first > 2 weeks (at least that I saw). There should be a cutoff time but I'm > open to the correct length for that. (Right now the main reason not > to make it longer is the 7-day waiting period for paradox, making it > longer could lead to "get the win, then appeal the judgement" type of > scams).
How does that scam work? - Falsifian
