On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:13 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 11:06 PM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > On 2020-06-02 12:37, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote: > > >> * Registrar > > >> * Deregistration: [Deregistration] > > >> * Changing the master switch of a player: > > >> * If to Agora, [Zombification] > > >> * If to emself, [Unzombification] > > >> * Submission of a Canteus Cygneus, if to a public forum: > [Canteus > > >> Cygneus] > > > > > > I think a uniform [Attn: Registrar] would be easier for all concerned > > > to remember. Keeping my eyes open for a single keyword seems easier > > > than looking for several, and I'm not sure how having more than one > > > helps given that I need to read them all anyway. > > > > *** TL;DR for Officers just joining in: Reply here with how you want to > > be notified of actions relating to your office. Would you prefer signals > > describing the actions (i.e. "[Zombification]") or just a mention of > > your office in the subject bar (i.e. "[attn: Registrar]")? > > > > I actually debated about whether to make most of the actions require > > just a normal officer signal but decided to go for a maximalist approach > > for more specificity. Now I'm looking at it, though, and I see that I > > probably went way too far. > > > > The best way to remedy this would be to ask each officer what the most > > logical set of tags would be. I, for instance, think it would be > > valuable for the Notary to be able to distinguish between posts about > > the creation and destruction of Pledges and Contracts, but the H. Notary > > might prefer them to be a uniform officer signal. > > > > So, Officers of Agora, I now ask you for your feedback on this. Action > > signals or officer signals or something else? > > > > In the final version of the contract I might add a provision where > > Officers can amend their own sections of the contract either without > > objection or with low support regardless of whether or not they are > > parties, allowing the officers more control. This might be a good idea > > anyway because it's in-line with the contract's goal of making quality > > of life better for Officers. > > > > Now, discuss! > > > The Promotorial Proposal Office would prefer the use of [Proposal]. An > Attn. signal, to us, indicates something out of the ordinary that requires > a special or urgent response. > yeah it'd be much more useful to have subject lines like [Pledge] and [Contract] than have it all be [attn notary] -- >From R. Lee
