On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:02 PM Aris Merchant via agora-business <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > I submit the following proposals. > > -Aris > --- > Title: Order-Independent Resolutions > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: > > Amend the rule entitled "Popular Proposal Proposer Privilege" > by changing it to read in full: > > The player who proposed the proposal with the greatest F/A, as > defined in rule 955, among all proposals assessed in the last 7 > days CAN once earn one Legislative Card by announcement, provided that > no decision on whether to adopt any proposal distributed in the same > message remains open. If there is a tie, all authors of the tied proposals > may do so once each. > > --- > Title: Why Track Pendency? > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: > > [Currently, Sets would make me track proposals forever. The simplest > fix is just to make the Pended switch untracked. It'll end up getting > effectively tracked anyway, since it determines whether a proposal must > be distributed.] > > Amend the rule entitled "Pending Proposals" by changing the text "Pended is a > negative boolean proposal switch tracked by the Promotor." to read > "Pended is an untracked negative boolean proposal switch." > --- > Title: Ministerial Reshuffling > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2605, "Ministries", by changing the lettered list to read: > > A. Ministry of Economy: regulate the economy > B. Ministry of Efficiency: maximize official efficiency > C. Ministry of Justice: serve justice > D. Ministry of Legislation: effectuate legislation > E. Ministry of Participation: encourage participation > > --- > Title: Proposal Recycling Initiative > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: > > > [This helps for any proposals that either were distributed before the new > regime and failed quorum, or any proposals that are accidentally distributed > and failed quorum. While I'm at it, there's no reason this needs to be at > power 3.0.] > > Amend Rule 2350, "Proposals", by deleting the text: > If a decision of whether to adopt a proposal was resolved as > FAILED QUORUM in the last seven days, the Promotor CAN once add > the proposal back to the Proposal Pool by announcement. > > Enact a new rule entitled "Proposal Recycling", with the following text: >
Would you like to specify the power of this rule? > > If a decision of whether to adopt a proposal was resolved as > FAILED QUORUM in the last seven days, the Promotor CAN once recycle > the proposal by announcement, adding it to the Proposal Pool and causing > it to become pended. > > --- > Title: Referenda > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 1607, "Distribution", by replacing: > > Determining whether to adopt a proposal is an Agoran decision. For > this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the adoption > index is initially the adoption index of the proposal, or 1.0 if > the proposal does not have one, and the text, author, coauthors, > class and (if applicable) chamber of the proposal are essential > parameters. Initiating such a decision is known as distribution, > and removes the proposal from the Proposal Pool. > > with: > > A referendum is the Agoran decision to determine whether to adopt a > proposal. > For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the adoption index is > initially the adoption index of the proposal, or 1.0 if the proposal does > not > have one, and the text, author, coauthors, class and (if applicable) chamber > of the proposal are essential parameters. Initiating a referendum is known > as distribution, and removes the proposal from the Proposal Pool. > > > Amend Rule 2350, "Proposals", by changing the text "If a decision of whether > to > adopt a proposal was resolved as FAILED QUORUM in the last seven days" > to read "If a referendum on a proposal was resolved as FAILED QUORUM in the > last seven days". > > Amend Rule 2606, "Proposal Classes", by changing the text "Agoran decision on > its adoption" to read "referendum on it". > > Amend Rule 2607, "Proposal Chambers", by changing the text "Agoran decision on > its adoption" to read "referendum on it". > > Amend Rule 106, "Adopting Proposals", by changing the text "a decision about > whether to adopt a proposal" to read "a referendum on a proposal". > > Amend Rule 879, "Quorum", by changing the text "the Agoran decision on whether > to adopt a proposal" to read "the referendum". > > Amend Rule 2168, "Extending the voting period", by changing the text > "whether to adopt a proposal" to read "a referendum on a proposal". Why does this need to specify "on a proposal"? > > Amend Rule 2496, Rewards, by changing the text "FOR the decision" to read > "FOR the referendum" and replacing: > Resolving an Agoran Decision on whether to adopt a proposal, > provided that no other Agoran Decision on whether to adopt that > or any other proposal had been resolved earlier in that Agoran > week: 5 coins (ADoP). > with: > Resolving a referendum, provided that no other referendum had been resolved > earlier in that Agoran week: 5 coins (ADoP). > > Amend Rule 2438, "Ribbons", by changing the text "an Agoran Decision" to > read "a referendum". Do we necessarily want to do this? I think that we could in the future propose alternatives to referenda that we may still want to award Orange ribbons for. Without this change, the text would still function and would be just as readable. > > Amend the rule entitled "Popular Proposal Proposer Privilege" by changing > the text "provided that no decision on whether to adopt any proposal > distributed > in the same message remains open." to read "provided that > no referendum initiated in the same message remains open." > > Amend the rule entitled "Proposal Recycling" by changing "If a > decision of whether > to adopt a proposal was resolved as FAILED QUORUM in the last seven days" > to read "If a referendum on a proposal was resolved as FAILED QUORUM in the > last seven days". I think this should include an equivalent text for if Proposal Recycling doesn't exist.
