On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:43 AM Rebecca via agora-business
<agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> Blots are about to be significantly harder to remove, and the general
> Agoran expectation is that certain crime is pretty much constant and
> usually no big deal (mainly slightly late officer reports, perhaps things
> like trivial faking). Why don't we reflect that in our rules?
>
> I create the following proposal
> Title: Slap on the wrist
> AI: 2
> Chamber: Justice
> Text:  Amend rule 2555 "Blots" by replacing the text "To levy a fine of N
> on a person, where N is a positive integer, is to grant em N blots." with
> the text "To levy a fine of N on a person, where N is a positive integer or
> zero, is to grant em N blots"
> --
> From R. Lee

I'm happy to have this discretion to use, but I also wonder whether it
wouldn't be better to either remove the minimum of 3 for expungement
with apologies or allow apologies to be considered when determining
the fine's amount.
  • DIS: Re: BUS: [Propos... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
    • Re: DIS: Re: BUS... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
      • Re: DIS: Re:... Rebecca via agora-discussion
        • Re: DIS:... nch via agora-discussion
        • Re: DIS:... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
          • Re: ... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
            • ... Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
              • ... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
                • ... Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
                • ... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
                • ... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion

Reply via email to