On 6/12/20 9:38 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > That's just my paranoia because I'm not particularly well-versed in > Agora's Ruleset or CfJ precedents. > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 4:36 PM nch via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org > <mailto:agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>> wrote: > > On 6/12/20 9:34 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > > On 6/12/20 9:22 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: > >> 🏴☠️ THE BOOTY > >> > >> Coins transferred to the Plundership from the Lost and Found > Department and > >> in current ownership of the Plundership is the Booty. A Coffer > is an amount > >> equal to the current Booty, divided by the amount of Pirates, > rounded down. > >> > >> 🏴☠️ SHARING THE BOOTY > >> > >> A party to this Contract can Yohoho by announcement. Doing so > transfers one > >> Coffer of coins to each Pirate from the Plundership. This is > the only way > >> that coins can transfer from the Plundership to a Pirate. > > Is it intentional that the amount a Coffer is worth goes down when > > someone Yohoho's? And what stops you from doing it repeatedly? > > > > -- > > nch > > Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager > > > > > Oops, I misread what Yohohoing does, nevermind, those questions are > irrelevant. A separate question: Why define the Booty as only the > money > from L&F? The way this is defined if the contract got coins some > other > way they wouldn't be part of the booty. > > -- > nch > Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager > > It should work fine if it just says "The Booty is the amount of coins currently owned by the Plundership." As is, if someone for some reason donated coins to the Plundership those coins would just stay 'stuck' there because they're not part of the Booty. Not sure why that would happen, but we shouldn't limit our chances at plunder.
-- nch Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager
