On 6/18/2020 7:05 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
Oh - forgot a couple comments!
On 6/18/2020 1:37 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
Enact a power-1 rule entitled "Discarding" with the following text:
When a player pays a set of at least 2 cards,
You need to add something here - "pay" on its own could count paying
someone else, a contract could be set up that you could keep "paying" to
create cards in the deck and get a fee.
As a side-note, could we add back to Sets a single-word term that means
trading cards for currencies? The first draft used "transmute" but that's
being used in a proposal now. It would be much easier to say "when a card
is transmuted..." so it's only triggered when that particular kind of
exchange happens (I had this problem with barrels, too).
Transform maybe? Convert? Neither term is currently used in the ruleset.
On 6/18/2020 1:37 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
-I was going to originally have the Discard Pile be another separate
entity where Discarded Cards and Cards paid in sets went, and then were
"shuffled" into the Deck at the start of this month. I decided against
it for sake of simplicity, but would that be a good idea?
Having a discard pile reduced the amount of error I mentioned in the last
email. Without a discard pile, if there's a CFJ on whether a card payment
happened, then it effectively freezes dealing from the deck until it's
resolved. With a discard pile, you could just "leave the uncertainty in
the discard pile" for a while and keep dealing.
Alright. I will add the discard pile into the next draft.
--
ATMunn
friendly neighborhood notary here :)
