On 6/23/20 3:21 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 1:16 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> On 6/23/20 4:13 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote: >>> I publish the following Notice of Honour: >>> +1 Agora (Agora has negative karma right now) >>> -1 Unspecified Behavior (for being suspicious and mysterious and >> weird) >> >> >> Does this actually "Specify any other player or Agora to lose karma"? We >> have no idea who "Unspecified Behavior" is, so this arguably fails at >> "specifying" a player. > > I'm not sure about this, but here's a counter-argument. You have no clue > who Aris or ATMunn or Falsifian is either. You have more information about > them, such as their dates of registration. That being said, there's no > particular reason why the information you have attributed to those names > somehow makes those them Canonical Player Names with magical properties. > Unspecified Behavior is Unspecified Behavior, the same way I'm Aris and > ATMunn is ATMunn. > > -Aris
Unspecified Behavior didn't argue that they are Unspecified Behavior (or even use that as a name). E argued that e is some existing player, which we know by a different name. That's slightly different. I agree with your conclusion for a different reason: Notice of Honour has to specify a player, but not in an unambiguous way (which is required from some other actions). Seems pretty clear that (if UB is a player) ATMunn did so. -- nch Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager
