On 6/29/20 11:37 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > > On 6/29/2020 8:05 AM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:50 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, I think the issue is that letting a person deregistered for crimes >>> back in the game sooner than a voluntary deregistrant is silly. Crime >>> deregistration should be a time out, I thought that was the main bug all >>> along. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Very biased, but I'm not at all sure it's silly. Someone who wishes to play >> but has accumulated 40 blots, without doing any serious destruction of the >> game (racial slurs, spam, repealing the entire ruleset, etc) is >> very different from someone who doesn't wish to play the game. >> > > Then blots shouldn't be an exile condition at all. Exile should be wholly > reserved for "this was bad enough that this person really shouldn't be > playing for a while". In fact, delinking exile from blots actually makes > sense now that we're shifting our view of blots - "exile" should now just > be a straight-up option for an indictment penalty.
I wondered about allowing arbitrary punishments as Indictments, but I think such punishments should require a higher level of consent, so might as well be done by proposal. > > If bugs allow for gaming/profitability of exile, those are true bugs. For > example: given the existence of lockboxes, I think exile should (somehow, > it's hard) embargo/seize all of their locked possessions. > > -G. > -- ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth
