I think the interesting gameplay arises in passing rules in different cabals, such that you win without either having known.
> On Aug 24, 2020, at 10:05, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > >> On Aug 24, 2020, at 2:32 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion >> <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: >> >> First turn, after (necessarily) talking to a cabal of players to get it >> passed: "Randomly choose a player among me and [the cabal]. That player >> wins and the game ends." > > Admittedly, you have more experience playing "cutthroat" nomics than I do. > That being said, I'm not quite sure if I would vote for a proposal like that. > I guess it's a good deal iff you think your odds of winning "fair and square" > (i.e. finding a way to have specifically you win, as opposed to getting lucky > with a cabal proposal) are lower than 1/(size of cabal). So you'd need a > majority of players to be pretty sure they were below average, which doesn't > strike me as particularly likely. > > Gaelan
