I've worded the miscalculation example pretty poorly lol. Basically we've had miscalculations held as true many times in the past. If you believed those miscalculations to still be true after being shown proof of how they're wrong, then you'd likely be called deluded.
The thing is that, prior to the reveal, we had collectively held these 'deluded' ideas to be true. Incorrect things were magically true. On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 12:27 PM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe it does, though. > > If for example, a majority of us believes (or... pretends to, lol) that > 1+1=3, then for the purposes of the game, it is so. We've had wrong beliefs > be gamestate before, eg. all of our miscalculations over the years. Of > course, if given the evidence, you still believed so, you'd likely call > them to be deluded, > > but > > we have held these 'deluded' beliefs to be actual truth. It was magically > true. > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:09 AM Aspen via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 6:06 AM Cuddle Beam via agora-business >> <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: >> > >> > I CFJ the following: >> > >> > "Be X the first Judge assigned to this CFJ, the entirety of the Ruleset >> > means the following: >> > >> > This is the Ruleset for the game of Agora nomic, and X is the sole >> player >> > of this game. X can change the Ruleset in any manner they desire by >> > publishing a sufficiently clear message detailing such changes to an >> Agoran >> > mailing list." >> >> Someone can say that the ruleset means whatever they like. It doesn't >> magically become true, even if they're a judge. A judgement has to be >> a plausible interpretation to have any precedential value. >> >> -Aspen >> >
