On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:10 PM Aspen via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:47 PM ais523 via agora-official > <agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > 8658* Aspen 3.0 SLR Ratification > > Conditional: If G. and Murphy both vote FOR, then FOR, otherwise > > AGAINST. (I haven't checked it in sufficient detail to make sure that > > it's correct / nothing is broken.) > > I'm a bit frustrated by the fact this is failing (I am *not* > frustrated at any specific voters). To the best of my knowledge, there > is no recent version of the ruleset that anyone has completely checked > and signed off on. This is the read the ruleset week version from this > year, presumably the most checked of the year. I'm fairly sure there > have been erata to the ruleset since last year's RtRW version, so we > can't ratify that either. However, we haven't ratified a ruleset for > two years now, which is a pretty long time. I'm not sure what needs to > be done to get people to read and approve a version of the ruleset. I > believe that this is the best version to ratify. I would appreciate it > if someone could give me suggestions on how to get this or another > recent version of the ruleset ratified. > > There was a recent scare where it seemed possible that reenacting > rules was broken (this discussion happened entirely on Discord). It > was determined that the last ratification had happened days after the > most recent reenactment. I would really like to get a version of the > ruleset ratified soon, so we don't have to worry about problems like > that.
I feel like the solution might involve leaving a version up for a while to check it. I think I've done that in the past maybe, I'm sorry for getting frustrated. I'm pretty tired and frustrated in general these days. Maybe I need to take a break for a bit. -Aspen
