On 4/11/2022 10:40 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > No, it's not reasonable to expect new players to read through decades of > judgements. However, that doesn't eliminate the fact that the precedent > exists. Generally relevant precedents will be brought up by people aware > of them when needed.
I mean, it *might* be reasonable for a new player to think "I'm putting in a high-powered proposal that claims to freeze agora, directly trying to loophole something that the rules explicitly say is a High Crime and shouldn't be done - maybe there's reasons I shouldn't do that." -G.
