On Sun, 2023-04-02 at 11:27 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> So, by my count there's 3 people who could win via radiance pretty
> much at any time due to stamps.  I sure don't begrudge the wins at
> all, but it's extremely demotivtating to bother to get radiance, to
> know it could be reset at any time on a whim.  Really gives a "no
> point in trying" feeling to radiance right now except via stamps.
> 
> Holding onto a win for later can be fine - e.g. for Ribbons, because
> one person's ribbon win doesn't reset anybody else's progress.  But
> for radiance it seems that one method (stamps) can be banked
> indefinitely and reset everyone's progress whenever, while the other
> radiance methods time out, don't seem like the best game design
> overall? My own first thoughts on a fix would be to make stamps win on
> their own track (a separate win type from radiance), but curious what
> others think.
> 
> Maybe I'm thinking about the strategy wrong, it could be played
> "radiance is only about stamps and the other methods are just little
> get-aheads" but we haven't really made the game read that way?

Am I one of the people who could get a Radiance win immediately by
cashing in stamps? In my case, it isn't malice or anything like that –
it's a case of not being sufficiently tuned into the game to know what
the exchange rate is and whether it would be worth doing, so I mostly
just let things drift. (Part of the reason I haven't been bothering
with the stamp game much is that ais523 stamps are so common that I
can't easily trade for anything else, so I feel somewhat locked out of
the game at the moment. I have some Madrid stamps too: if people are
interested in trading for those, that might be a deal worth making.)

I think a worthwhile approach would be to make it so that, at a
minimum, the legacy stamps can be cashed in for a win without upsetting
the ongoing radiance competition (even if it's just via a proposal
along the lines of "if ais523 has at least N ais523 stamps, revoke N
ais523 stamps from em, and ais523 wins").

-- 
ais523

Reply via email to