On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 9:28 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I appreciate it, but I believe that's begging the question. It's only
> possible to ratify that "Agora exists" if Agora already exists in the first
> place.
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 5:20 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 3:35 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
> > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I intend to ratify without objection: {The current gamestate is the
> > result
> > > of an unbroken sequence of gameplay and unbroken continuous existence
> of
> > > the game since the moment that this nomic has started to exist on June
> > 30,
> > > 1993, 00:04:30 GMT +1200.}
> > >
> >
> > Maybe we should just ratify without objection: "Agoranomic currently
> > exists."
> > and then add a statement that doesn't ratify: (Whether or not the game
> > didn't exist in the past, it now currently exists, wholly and legally.
> Even
> > if the game ever experienced a discontinuity previously, it now currently
> > exists, legally, and thus, if it ever did die or schrodinger die, the
> state
> > observed of the game is that it is in fact alive.)
> >
> > Again, this wouldn't do anything, but I don't think you'd get as much
> > objection. It's not necessary though, and on principle of RWO, it might
> get
> > objected anyway.
> > --
> > 4st
> > Referee and Deputy(AKA FAKE) webmastor
> > Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
> >
>
Hm. Well, then, obviously, we need to implement some rules to prevent this
situation from ever happening again, and then make Agora permanently
unossifieable, so that if this question ever came up again, or if agora DID
die, it could come back to life anyway.
--
4st
Referee and Deputy(AKA FAKE) webmastor
Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
