On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:40 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
<agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I'd argue that I fit criteria 4 of Rule 2519 ("Consent"):
> "4. it is reasonably clear from context that e wanted the action to
> take place or assented to it taking place."
There's quite a few precedents in different contexts that future
actions aren't well-defined things, so "the action" in question is
inherently uncertain if it is a "future not-yet-existing" thing, if
those precedents apply to this situation.
-G.
