On 3/4/24 12:19, Goren Barak via agora-business wrote:
> ๐‘ฃ๐‘ง๐‘ค๐‘ด ๐‘ฉ๐‘œ๐‘น๐‘ฉ,
> ๐‘ฒ ๐‘›๐‘ง๐‘’๐‘ค๐‘บ ๐‘๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘‘๐‘น๐‘ฐ ๐‘š๐‘ฒ ๐‘จ๐‘๐‘ฉ๐‘”๐‘ฐ ๐‘“ ยท๐‘š๐‘ง๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฏ ยท๐‘œ๐‘น๐‘ง๐‘ฏ
> ๐‘‘ ๐‘ณ๐‘š๐‘ก๐‘ง๐‘’๐‘‘, ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฒ๐‘‘ "๐‘ฒ ๐‘ณ๐‘š๐‘ก๐‘ง๐‘’๐‘‘ ๐‘‘ ๐‘๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘‘๐‘น๐‘ฐ ๐‘š๐‘ฒ ๐‘จ๐‘๐‘ฉ๐‘”๐‘ฐ"
> 
> ๐‘œ๐‘ซ๐‘›๐‘š๐‘ฒ ๐‘ฉ๐‘œ๐‘น๐‘ฉ

A few notes on this, besides the fact it probably doesn't work for
effort reasons:

I assume you meant to make an intent here, you first need to publish
something to the effect of "I intend to declare apathy..." and then do
the "I declare apathy" after the intent has been around and un-objected
long enough.

Even if the intent was written correctly, the second sentence doesn't do
anything. You cannot add a non-rule-defined restriction on objections,
so objections like Janet's (where e objected without even being sure
there's an intent) still work.

-- 
nix

Reply via email to