> On Mar 4, 2024, at 6:55โฏPM, nix via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 3/4/24 12:19, Goren Barak via agora-business wrote: >> ๐ฃ๐ง๐ค๐ด ๐ฉ๐๐น๐ฉ, >> ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐๐ค๐บ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐น๐ฐ ๐๐ฒ ๐จ๐๐ฉ๐๐ฐ ๐ ยท๐๐ง๐ฏ ๐ฏ ยท๐๐น๐ง๐ฏ >> ๐ ๐ณ๐๐ก๐ง๐๐, ๐ฎ๐ฒ๐ "๐ฒ ๐ณ๐๐ก๐ง๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐น๐ฐ ๐๐ฒ ๐จ๐๐ฉ๐๐ฐ" >> >> ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ฉ๐๐น๐ฉ > > A few notes on this, besides the fact it probably doesn't work for > effort reasons: > > I assume you meant to make an intent here, you first need to publish > something to the effect of "I intend to declare apathy..." and then do > the "I declare apathy" after the intent has been around and un-objected > long enough. > > Even if the intent was written correctly, the second sentence doesn't do > anything. You cannot add a non-rule-defined restriction on objections, > so objections like Janet's (where e objected without even being sure > there's an intent) still work. > > -- > nix >
Beyond standard by-announcement rules, thereโs also the explicit requirement in 1728/46 that tabling an intent specifies certain information โwithout obfuscationโ; itโs hard to imagine the choice of alphabet here was not done with the intention to obfuscate. Gaelan
