On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:03 AM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/30/24 11:52, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> > I object.
> > Per Rule 2576 "Ownership", the asset goes into abeyance as soon as the
> > owner is ambiguous.
> > The owner becomes ambiguous at step 2, wherein we are not sure if ais523
> > can take the asset due to the ensuing contradiction.
> > Therefore, both CFJs should be FALSE, as neither party can cash a promise
> > that is in abeyance.
>
> You cannot object to a judgment, but you can either file a Motion to
> Reconsider or call a Moot on these CFJs. Here's the specifics of both:
>
> {
> Rule 911/55 (Power=1.7)
> Motions and Moots
>
> If a judgement has been in effect for less then seven days and has
> not been entered into Moot, then:
>
> - The judge of that CFJ CAN self-file a Motion to Reconsider the
> case by announcement, if e has not already self-filed a Motion
> to Reconsider that CFJ.
> - Any Player CAN group-file a Motion to Reconsider the case with 2
> support, if the CFJ has not had a Motion to Reconsider
> group-filed for it at any time while it has been assigned to its
> current judge.
>
> When a Motion to Reconsider is so filed, the case is rendered open
> again.
>
> If a CFJ has a judgement assigned, a player CAN enter that
> judgement into Moot with N+2 support, where N is the number of
> weeks since that judgement has been assigned, rounded down. When
> this occurs, the CFJ is suspended, and the Arbitor is once
> authorized to initiate the Agoran decision to determine public
> confidence in the judgement, which e SHALL do in a timely fashion.
>
> For this decision, the vote collector is the Arbitor and the valid
> options are AFFIRM, REMAND, and REMIT. When the decision is
> resolved, the effect depends on the outcome:
>
> - AFFIRM, FAILED QUORUM: The judgement is reassigned to the case,
> and cannot be entered into Moot again.
>
> - REMAND: The case becomes open again.
>
> - REMIT: The case becomes open again, and the current judge is
> recused. The Arbitor SHALL NOT assign em to the case again
> unless no other eligible judges have displayed interest in
> judging.
> }
>
> --
> nix
> Arbitor, Spendor
>
>
Ah, but that requires me becoming a player! Not at this time, trixy trixy
nixy!
--
4ˢᵗ
Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
