Janet Cobb via agora-business [2025-07-17 13:55]: > On 7/17/25 12:57, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote: > > [spendie mass is conserved, despite the impossible physics that occurs.] > > [At what point do I end up committing a crime?] > > (apologies to anyone who is left out, I do not have enough spendies for > > everyone, but I do have enough for the generally active players.) > > I want to transfer all of my spendies without actually doing any > > transferring, creation, or destruction of spendies, as an experiment, > > therefore: > > > > I intend to, without objection, ratify the following document at the > > current time of publication: > […] > > I object. > > I believe this likely does meet the bar of Endorsing Forgery; it does > not "clearly and plainly describe" the error (that the balances are > incorrect).
I'm not sure this meets the hypothesis of that paragraph. It also requires that “a corrected document could be produced with reasonable effort”, but there's not mechanism to create the document that 4st is trying to ratify. -- juan Devil's advocate
