On Fri, 2025-07-18 at 11:41 -0300, juan via agora-discussion wrote: > Janet Cobb via agora-business [2025-07-17 13:55]: > > On 7/17/25 12:57, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote: > > > [spendie mass is conserved, despite the impossible physics that occurs.] > > > [At what point do I end up committing a crime?] > > > (apologies to anyone who is left out, I do not have enough spendies for > > > everyone, but I do have enough for the generally active players.) > > > I want to transfer all of my spendies without actually doing any > > > transferring, creation, or destruction of spendies, as an experiment, > > > therefore: > > > > > > I intend to, without objection, ratify the following document at the > > > current time of publication: > > […] > > > > I object. > > > > I believe this likely does meet the bar of Endorsing Forgery; it does > > not "clearly and plainly describe" the error (that the balances are > > incorrect). > > I'm not sure this meets the hypothesis of that paragraph. It also requires > that “a corrected document could be produced with reasonable effort”, > but there's not mechanism to create the document that 4st is trying > to ratify.
It would be possible to produce a corrected list of Spendie holdings with reasonable effort, though. -- ais523
