[This file lists the contents of the proposal pool. File generated at 2010-07-25T20:46:51Z. Not necessarily up to date as of then; recent changes may be missing.
NOT A SOURCE FILE: automatically generated, do not edit. ] }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: Green ai: 1.7 interest: 1 proposer: Murphy title: Stereotypes submit_date: 2010-07-20 submit_mid: <4c45ac32.7090...@socal.rr.com> distributability: undistributable Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by appending, immediately after this text: As soon as possible after a judicial panel is assigned, each member of the panel SHALL publish an appeals opinion indicating a valid judgement to assign to the case -- only the last such published opinion for each member is used to determine the outcome. Each member SHOULD choose an appropriate judgement, and include arguments for eir choice. this text, followed by a paragraph break: If prejudice is not explicitly specified, then an opinion indicating AFFIRM or REMAND implicitly indicates without prejudice, while an opinion indicating REMIT or OVERRULE implicitly indicates with prejudice. }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: Purple ai: 1.0 interest: 1 proposer: Yally title: Win by Respect submit_date: 2010-07-20 submit_mid: <aanlktik4pivdmy2a_9pbrxp7xg10temg0szqgx-nu...@mail.gmail.com> distributability: distributable distributability flipped: 2010-07-20 00:00:00 Append the following to Rule 2287: "A player with 30 or more props CAN destroy all eir props to satisfy the Winning Condition of Respect. 14 props are then created in that player's possession." }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: Purple ai: 2.0 interest: 2 proposer: coppro title: Website Fix submit_date: 2010-07-21 submit_mid: <4c46a5b6.7070...@gmail.com> distributability: distributable distributability flipped: 2010-07-21 00:00:00 Enact a new rule entitled "Website Fixup" at power 2 with the following text: During the Submission Period, any player CAN, by announcement, submit a Website Submission. A Website Submission is a document or collection of documents intended to replace the web page at http://agoranomic.org/. A player CAN by announcement withdraw a Website Submission (causing it to cease to be a Website Submission). Submitting a Website Submission causes any earlier Website Submission authored by the same player to be withdrawn. Website Submissions have ID numbers, to be assigned by the the Sysadmin. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the Sysadmin has no report and has II 0. The Sysadmin is an imposed office, its holder is coppro. If the Submission Period has not began, Taral CAN, by announcement, begin it, and e also CAN, by announcement, cause this Rule to repeal itself. If the Submission Period has not began and this Rule has been in the Ruleset for more than two weeks, any player CAN, by announcement, cause this Rule to repeal itself. Two weeks after the Submission Period begins, it ends. As soon as possible thereafter, the Sysadmin SHALL initiate an Agoran decision to pick the winning Website Sumbission; the options shall be each Website Submission and NO WINNER. Each active player is an eligible voter for this decision, as is Taral. Taral's voting limit is 3, every other voter's limit is 1. The text of each Website Submission is an essential parameter. When the Agoran decision is resolved, if a Website Submission was selected as the outcome, then its author is awarded two Leadership Tokens and Taral SHOULD update http://agoranomic.org/ to reflect the winning Website Submission. Regardless of the outcome, this rule then repeals itself. [Taral gets special treatment because e maintains the website. Imposing the office on myself will make sure I actually do the sysadminnery rather than shrug it off by resigning.] }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ chamber: Purple ai: 3.0 interest: 1 proposer: comex title: Adoption Without Objection submit_date: 2010-07-23 submit_mid: <aanlkti=gzn0vvegiej+tudoro5mq71af9bl1fehrc...@mail.gmail.com> distributability: distributable distributability flipped: 2010-07-23 00:00:00 Amend Rule 106 by replacing: If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED, then the proposal is adopted, and unless other rules prevent it from taking effect, its power is set to the minimum of four and its adoption index, and then it takes effect. A proposal with a decision on which the option selected by Agora is not ADOPTED does not take effect, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. with: If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED, then the proposal is adopted. When a proposal is adopted, unless other rules prevent it from taking effect, its power is set to the minimum of four and its adoption index, and then it takes effect. Causing a proposal to be adopted is a secured change; a proposal which has not been adopted does not take effect, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. Create a new Power-3 rule titled "Adoption Without Objection", with text: A player CAN, without objection, cause a proposal in the Proposal Pool to be adopted; it is then removed from the Proposal Pool. To avoid "spam scams", this action cannot be performed unless the message of intent has exactly one Subject header, which must contain the exact text "[AWO]" reasonably close to its beginning. [Along with actual gameplay comes the need to fix that gameplay; I don't want to wait weeks for uncontroversial proposals to be adopted. (Currently, it can take up to a month for a proposal to be adopted, without any rule violations by officeholders: I submit a proposal on Monday, the Promotor SHALL NOT distribute it until next Monday but e waits until next Sunday; voting period is one week, and the Assessor has one week after that to resolve the decision. Yuch.)]