Who are we to sit around and pass judgement on what a lady is going through? 
None of us were in her bedroom or inside her! I think before we go around 
clogging inboxes with this most atrocious discussion,  we need to see what we 
are doing and thinking most of the time? 
I think we all want to just blame the lady for nothing, without knowing 
anything, and it is none of our  business to just go on discussing about some 
one  on such a subject! Please discuss something valuable instead!
Preeti


Preeti Monga - Chief Executive Officer


Inspiring INCLUSION! Fostering DIGNITY!


Mobile : 91 9871701646
Landline : 011 22781446
E-mail : preeti.mo...@silver-linings.org /preeti.mo...@gmail.com
Website : www.silver-linings.org
Our Services: Recruitment , Trainings- Unique Motivation Programmes, Diversity 
& Inclusion, Prevention of Sexual Harassment
Connect With Us :




-----Original Message-----
From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of 
akshun mahajan via Ai
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 20:49
To: Share, empower &Enrich
Cc: akshun mahajan
Subject: Re: [Ai] Abhishek Behl reported in Hindustan Times yesterday: Gurgaon: 
Blind banker gets 10-year jail for raping blind woman

Hi all,
Well I spoke to some of very close friends to know the truth of this
story and I have found both male and female are equally responsible.
Things were fine until boy did not get job.
This is also true that he told female that he will get her job and get
married with her but after getting job boy started avoiding she as a
result of this lady went to court.
One thing is very sure that she was not raped. They were doing with
consent when this lady find that after getting job he is avoiding her
and she got frusted and starting threatening this boy, boy took also
lightly as a result of this he was awarded punishment.


On 7/27/17, P. Subramani via Ai <ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> wrote:
> in the end, it seems all laws are gender-biased towards women  including
> section498A, a sighted person wouldn't have received this quantum of
> punishment, obviously women are taking undue advantage of such laws,  many
> courts have made observations about gender-biased laws,  this lower court's
> judgement should be challenged in the higher courts where obviously judges
> are much more learned, in most instances,  decisions are reversed in the
> higher courts, media always reports such wrong things perpetrated by the
> disabled persons, they neverever report brighter achievements of  our
> community
> E-Mail:  subramani6...@gmail.com
> Mob:  9738150192
> Facebook: facebook.com/subu.subramani.16
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "vivek doddamani via Ai" <ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in>
> To: "Share, empower &Enrich" <ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in>
> Cc: "vivek doddamani" <vivekka...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ai] Abhishek Behl reported in Hindustan Times yesterday:
> Gurgaon: Blind banker gets 10-year jail for raping blind woman
>
>
>> anything it may be my suggestion is the convict should go to high court
>>
>> On 7/27/17, Mahendra Galani via Ai <ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in>
>> wrote:
>>> Vivek, it is very easy to say then to do.
>>> we men may never understand the Shame felt by women.
>>> it takes enough currege to do it, specially for the disabled women,
>>> and dont forget, court found argument good enough to handover this
>>> punishment.
>>> we may talk about number of years given,however
>>> to comment more based on this artical, is for me dificult.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At 03:28 PM 7/27/2017 +0530, you wrote:
>>>>I agree this person had taken her to guest house
>>>>to meet an advocate and then he raped her after
>>>>coming out she could have immediately complained
>>>>to the guest house staff or to police, if the
>>>>sex was not occurred without her consent then
>>>>why she did not screem or shout for help,, here
>>>>notice that the man was also blind & woman could
>>>>have easily escaped from him and called for
>>>>help, here it is clearly understood that sex was
>>>>with full consent not rape by force. On 7/26/17,
>>>>swati saxena via Ai
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> wrote: > So
>>>>according to some of the views, does this case
>>>>does not demand any > form of punishment? Is the
>>>>woman not a victim in any form? > > Absolutely,
>>>>it should not be viewed from disability point of
>>>>view. > However I not at all agree that it was a
>>>>consensual sexual > relationship. > > It is
>>>>clearly stated in the article that she was raped
>>>>in the guest > house in the pretext of meeting
>>>>an advocate. Is raping someone does > not call
>>>>for punishment? If it is believed that this is
>>>>something > which does not demand punishment of
>>>>any form, then I question the > sensitivity and
>>>>understanding of what does rape means for a
>>>>women. > > Also even if it is consent (though I
>>>>don't subscribe to this view), > then we also
>>>>need to look what does consent means. If consent
>>>>means > first victimizing someone, doing crime
>>>>against them, above all showing > a rosy future,
>>>>leaving no alternative for them (which all
>>>>happened in > this case) and then asking for
>>>>consent then I agree it was a > consensual
>>>>sexual relationship. But if consent means an
>>>>absolute free > will of a person, without any
>>>>burden, any dependency then this may not > be a
>>>>consensual sex but still demands punishment. > >
>>>>If we go through the facts of the case, the
>>>>victim was first raped and > then they entered
>>>>into a relationship of whatever kind was it. > >
>>>>I will reiterate my previous belief that the
>>>>punishment is absolutely > welcome (though
>>>>people may question quantum) for what happened
>>>>in the > guest house. No rapist must be spared
>>>>measured from what so ever > yardstick. Rapists
>>>>must be given the harshest punishment demanded
>>>>of > whatever kind. > > > > On 7/26/17, B. R.
>>>>Nautial via Ai
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> wrote: >>
>>>>No. I think, this harsh punishment would have
>>>>not given to a normal >> person. >> Generally,
>>>>in every society, there's a big sympathey for
>>>>disabled, >> specially >> for visually impaired
>>>>but if he is involve in such a bad incident,
>>>>that >> sympathey takes a different way and in
>>>>such cases, judiciary will give him >> the
>>>>maximum punishment. >> ----- Original Message
>>>>----- >> From: "SPARSH GUPTA via Ai"
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >> To:
>>>>"Share, empower &Enrich"
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >> Cc:
>>>>"SPARSH GUPTA" <sparsh.nls....@gmail.com> >>
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 6:19 PM >>
>>>>Subject: Re: [Ai] Abhishek Behl reported in
>>>>Hindustan Times yesterday: >> Gurgaon: Blind
>>>>banker gets 10-year jail for raping blind
>>>>woman >> >> >>> Dear friends, >>> >>> first off,
>>>>I think it is very wrong on member's part to
>>>>jump on >>> conclusions without knowing the full
>>>>facts and without reading the >>> full judgement
>>>>as that would be the proper source to understand
>>>>the >>> opinion of the H'ble Judge in light of
>>>>the facts and circumstances of >>> the matter
>>>>under consideration. >>> >>> Although the way
>>>>report in Hindustan Times is reported is
>>>>pretty >>> pathetic to be honest. The author has
>>>>not been prudent enough to put >>> the full
>>>>facts in the open and left many blanks to be
>>>>filled by the >>> reader themselves on whatever
>>>>suits them the best. Therefore, it would >>> be
>>>>a unfruitful discussion till we have the exact
>>>>copy of the >>> judgement. And being a lawyer
>>>>myself, I can say that with full >>>
>>>>understanding of the matter. >>> >>> and I
>>>>completely agree with Nupur here that we need to
>>>>look at this >>> from a general angle and not
>>>>the differently abled angle. Our justice >>>
>>>>system is based on the principle of equality
>>>>before law and equal >>> protection for all and
>>>>so taking into account such factors would be >>>
>>>>injustice to the person under
>>>>consideration. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Sparsh
>>>>Guptta >>> >>> On 7/26/17, Dinesh Kaushal via Ai
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >>>
>>>>wrote: >>>> Well put Swati, >>>> >>>> Consent is
>>>>absolutely important and many of us missed this
>>>>point in the >>>> article. >>>> >>>> We may not
>>>>know exact facts, so we need to restraint
>>>>ourselves from such >>>> discussions. It is
>>>>court to decide whether consent was there or
>>>>not. How >>>> come we have just jumped on
>>>>conclusion that court has been
>>>>unnecessarily >>>> biased against
>>>>men? >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original
>>>>Message----- >>>> From: Ai
>>>>[mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in]
>>>>On Behalf >>>> Of >>>> swati saxena via Ai >>>>
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 5:20 PM >>>> To:
>>>>Share, empower &Enrich
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >>>> Cc:
>>>>swati saxena <swatisaxena...@gmail.com> >>>>
>>>>Subject: Re: [Ai] Abhishek Behl reported in
>>>>Hindustan Times yesterday: >>>> Gurgaon: Blind
>>>>banker gets 10-year jail for raping blind
>>>>woman >>>> >>>> HI All, >>>> >>>> Directly
>>>>quoting from the article below lines. >>>> "On
>>>>the pretext of meeting an advocate, Kapoor had
>>>>taken the victim on >>>> May 30, 2015, to a
>>>>guest house in Gurgaon and raped her there for
>>>>the >>>> first time. He later continued to abuse
>>>>her, promising marriage." >>>> >>>> It clearly
>>>>states that the victim was raped by the convict
>>>>first time >>>> on pretext of meeting an
>>>>advocate. How can it be justified as having >>>>
>>>>sexual relationship with the consent of the
>>>>women? The lines further >>>> states that later
>>>>he abused her promising marriage. The words
>>>>" >>>> pretext of meeting an advocate" and
>>>>"abuse" are enough evidences to >>>> impose
>>>>rigorous" punishment on the convict. >>>> >>>>
>>>>Subsequent sexual relationship could be on
>>>>consent basis (facts in the >>>> article
>>>>insufficient to conclude the consent part),
>>>>however this does >>>> not in any case justify
>>>>his act of raping the women for the first
>>>>time >>>> in the guest house. The interpretation
>>>>by members that at the first >>>> instance also
>>>>it was on consent is wrong. I believe no matter
>>>>whatever >>>> happened after that, this
>>>>punishment is highly justified for what he >>>>
>>>>did in the guest house. Future innocence (though
>>>>no proof of that in >>>> the article) in any
>>>>case, cannot justify the heinous crime in
>>>>the >>>> first instance. >>>> >>>> Comments like
>>>>“men have to suffer in India because of these
>>>>gender >>>> biased laws† and “this would
>>>>further de-motivate men to have sexual >>>>
>>>>relationship with women even with their
>>>>consent†are highly >>>> unfortunate. These
>>>>statements try to show that men are highly >>>>
>>>>vulnerable in the hands of women because of
>>>>these laws which is not >>>> the case going by
>>>>the rape statistics and innumerable crime
>>>>against >>>> women in India. As such comments
>>>>are coming from members I am forced >>>> to
>>>>write that because of such grievous acts by men,
>>>>females have to >>>> live in India under a
>>>>highly controlled environment which acts as
>>>>a >>>> roadblock for them in various scenarios
>>>>during their whole life cycle. >>>> >>>>
>>>>Cheers >>>> Swati Saxena >>>> >>>> >>>> On
>>>>7/26/17, vivek doddamani via Ai
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >>>>
>>>>wrote: >>>>> I agree with Prateek in sighted
>>>>persons such cases occur but we have >>>>> never
>>>>heard such a harsh punishment of 10 years, & in
>>>>this case the >>>>> sexual relation had been
>>>>between two person consent here we should
>>>>use >>>>> the word cheating instead of
>>>>rape, >>>>> >>>>> On 7/26/17, prateek aggarwal
>>>>via Ai >>>>>
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >>>>>
>>>>wrote: >>>>>> The widow went in a guest house
>>>>with the boy to have sexual >>>>>> relationship
>>>>by her will and continued going on repeated
>>>>basis. How >>>>>> can this be even called rape
>>>>is the question. >>>>>> @Avinash, I agree that
>>>>the silver lining is that women knocked
>>>>the >>>>>> door of court and found a favorable
>>>>judgement, but I believe that this >>>>>> can
>>>>further de-motivate men to have sexual
>>>>relationship with women, >>>>>> even if the
>>>>women are consenting to do so. >>>>>> Who would
>>>>want to get into troubles like this,  even after
>>>>having done >>>>>> sex with consent of the woman
>>>>afterall. >>>>>> The judgement would strengthen
>>>>the opinion that blind women are not >>>>>>
>>>>quite  sexual being, which is already a
>>>>prevalent  belief  in the >>>>>> society. >>>>>>
>>>>This is truly illogical and one-sided in my
>>>>opinion. >>>>>> Unfortunate. >>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>Regards, >>>>>> Prateek agarwal. >>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>On 7/26/17, avinash shahi via Ai
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >>>>>>
>>>>wrote: >>>>>>> The surviver in the under
>>>>discussion order is a widow; this fact
>>>>and >>>>>>> her precarious circumstance may have
>>>>led the judge to pronounce such >>>>>>>
>>>>a >>>>>>> harsh punishment. He however can
>>>>approach the higher judiciary.  As a >>>>>>>
>>>>silver lining, There are very few blind women
>>>>who knock the door of >>>>>>> the courts when
>>>>their bodily integrity is violated. This
>>>>particular >>>>>>> order should deter blind men
>>>>in particular to not take blind women >>>>>>>
>>>>for >>>>>>> granted and for a ride. >>>>>>> On
>>>>7/26/17, Arjun Malhotra via Ai >>>>>>>
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >>>>>>>
>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>> Wasn't there a Supreme Court
>>>>Judgment recently on educated women and >>>>>>>>
>>>>promise of marriage. Why not apply that
>>>>yardstick in this case as >>>>>>>>
>>>>well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/26/17, Rahul
>>>>Kelapure via Ai >>>>>>>>
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >>>>>>>>
>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>> Agree with Prateek. Here I also
>>>>see a strainge attitude of the >>>>>>>>>
>>>>Judge >>>>>>>>> to justify high punishment to
>>>>the convict as the girl is blind and >>>>>>>>>
>>>>he >>>>>>>>> took advantage of her helplessness
>>>>as she was blind. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> While
>>>>techniclly it could be rape but how many would
>>>>Court award 10 >>>>>>>>> years riggerous jail
>>>>for this kind of matter in so called
>>>>normal >>>>>>>>> cases? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I
>>>>think, Judge has gone overboard while
>>>>pronouncing the sentence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>This is like two extreme sides of attitude for
>>>>disabled where on >>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>> hand
>>>>they will have extremely symphethy or they will
>>>>have abselute >>>>>>>>> indiference or hatred
>>>>for disabled. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If She was so
>>>>clear that, she would want to have sex only
>>>>after >>>>>>>>> marage >>>>>>>>> then first
>>>>marry and then do whatever. There are many
>>>>matters where >>>>>>>>> everything is consensual
>>>>but when things do not go as per the >>>>>>>>>
>>>>expectation, slap with rape
>>>>charges. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>Strainge. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am sure, this
>>>>will not stand the scrutiny in the higher court.
>>>>I >>>>>>>>> don't know how well the defence
>>>>fought the matter. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On
>>>>7/26/17, prateek aggarwal via Ai >>>>>>>>>
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> While questioning court's
>>>>decision is a crime itself in india, >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>isn't >>>>>>>>>> this unfair to punish man while
>>>>the repeated sexual relationships >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>were >>>>>>>>>> established in mutual consensus
>>>>of both the partners? >>>>>>>>>> As both of them
>>>>had sex multiple times since 2015, how can this
>>>>be >>>>>>>>>> even called rape on the first
>>>>place? >>>>>>>>>> Yes the news suggests that the
>>>>man has  promised marriage and   on >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>that pretext this sexual relationship was
>>>>established, but things >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>may >>>>>>>>>> happen in the course of  2 years
>>>>that may force a person to not >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>marry >>>>>>>>>> other. That does not definitely
>>>>take the fact away that the sex >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>happened with the consent of girl. >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>Promises like these are not documented here in
>>>>india. >>>>>>>>>> Personally, I feel that the
>>>>laws are sometimes being miss used by >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>females, like it has been in this context. This
>>>>is unfortunate. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Prateek
>>>>agarwal. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On
>>>>7/26/17, Ajay Minocha via Ai >>>>>>>>>>
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> A very welcome
>>>>judgement! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/26/17,
>>>>avinash shahi via Ai >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>><ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>http://www.hindustantimes.com/gurgaon/gurgaon-blind-banker-gets-10-year-jail-for-raping-blind-woman/story-xQAJGpWmso2ioCesDHV2UM.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A Gurgaon district
>>>>court on Monday awarded 10 years
>>>>rigorous >>>>>>>>>>>> imprisonment to a blind
>>>>man, a trainee probationary officer at
>>>>a >>>>>>>>>>>> public sector bank, who was found
>>>>guilty of raping a 33-year-old >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>blind >>>>>>>>>>>> widow repeatedly on the
>>>>pretext of marriage. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>The court also imposed a penalty on convict
>>>>Saurabh Kapoor, 35, >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>who >>>>>>>>>>>> was convicted of rape under
>>>>Section 376 of the
>>>>IPC. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Additional
>>>>Sessions Judge Rajni Yadav, while pronouncing
>>>>the >>>>>>>>>>>> quantum >>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>sentence, said that given the inhumanity of the
>>>>act, it was >>>>>>>>>>>> required to impose upon
>>>>the convict substantive and stern >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>sentence >>>>>>>>>>>> that would commensurate
>>>>with the gravity of the offence and
>>>>also >>>>>>>>>>>> serve >>>>>>>>>>>> as an
>>>>example to others. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>is to be noted that since both the victim and
>>>>the accused >>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>blind, the court had relied upon ‘voice
>>>>identification’ that >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>helped >>>>>>>>>>>> the woman to identify
>>>>Kapoor, a resident of Mayur Vihar
>>>>in >>>>>>>>>>>> Delhi. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>On the pretext of meeting an advocate, Kapoor
>>>>had taken the >>>>>>>>>>>> victim >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>on >>>>>>>>>>>> May 30, 2015, to a guest house
>>>>in Gurgaon and raped her there >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>for >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> first time. He
>>>>later continued to abuse her, promising
>>>>marriage. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The victim,
>>>>who has an eight-year-old daughter, worked in
>>>>a >>>>>>>>>>>> private >>>>>>>>>>>> company in
>>>>2015, when the incident happened. She is
>>>>currently >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>unemployed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Public prosecutor Arvind Sharma said that
>>>>the convict tried to >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>seek >>>>>>>>>>>> leniency from the court on
>>>>account of his
>>>>blindness. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> “The
>>>>accused also argued that he is a government
>>>>servant and >>>>>>>>>>>> highly >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>qualified, but all these arguments were rejected
>>>>by the court, >>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>awarded him 10 years of imprisonment,† said
>>>>Sharma, adding that >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>the >>>>>>>>>>>> court has imposed a penalty of
>>>>Rs 10,000, out of which Rs 8,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>would >>>>>>>>>>>> go to the victim. The
>>>>remaining Rs 2000 would go to the
>>>>state. >>>>>>>>>>>> If >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>the >>>>>>>>>>>> accused fail to pay the fine,
>>>>he will face one more year of >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>imprisonment. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>judge, in her order, also stated that undue
>>>>sympathy to >>>>>>>>>>>> impose >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>inadequate sentence to the accused would do more
>>>>harm as it will >>>>>>>>>>>> undermine the
>>>>public confidence. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>“Keeping in view the offence committed by the
>>>>convict, I am not >>>>>>>>>>>> inclined to take
>>>>a lenient view against him and release him
>>>>on >>>>>>>>>>>> probation. He has raped a young
>>>>woman who was helpless, >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>defenceless, >>>>>>>>>>>> vulnerable and an easy
>>>>prey who trusted the convict so much
>>>>that >>>>>>>>>>>> she >>>>>>>>>>>> surrendered
>>>>herself to him. He used, violated and exploited
>>>>her >>>>>>>>>>>> body,† >>>>>>>>>>>> the court
>>>>said. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> District
>>>>attorney Lal Singh Yadav said the court has
>>>>given a >>>>>>>>>>>> strong >>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>to the society. “The convict had sexually
>>>>exploited the >>>>>>>>>>>> victim >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>on the pretext of marriage,† he
>>>>said. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Avinash
>>>>Shahi >>>>>>>>>>>> Doctoral student at Centre
>>>>for Law and Governance JNU >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>Disclaimer: >>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Contents of the
>>>>mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect
>>>>the >>>>>>>>>>>> thinking >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>of >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> person sending
>>>>the mail and AI in no way relates itself to
>>>>its >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>veracity; >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2. AI cannot
>>>>be held liable for any commission/omission based
>>>>on >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>mails >>>>>>>>>>>> sent through this mailing
>>>>list.. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> To check if the post reached the list
>>>>or to search for old >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>posting, >>>>>>>>>>>> reach: >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ai
>>>>mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>  -- >>>>>>>>>>> Ajay Minocha >>>>>>>>>>> Mob :
>>>>+91-9584076767 >>>>>>>>>>> E mail :
>>>>ajayminoc...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>p13aj...@iimidr.ac.in >>>>>>>>>>> Skype:
>>>>ajayminocha2 >>>>>>>>>>> Disclaimer: >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise,
>>>>reflect the >>>>>>>>>>> thinking >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>of >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> person sending
>>>>the mail and AI in no way relates itself to
>>>>its >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>veracity; >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2. AI cannot
>>>>be held liable for any commission/omission based
>>>>on >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> mails >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>sent through this mailing
>>>>list.. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>> To check if the post reached the list or
>>>>to search for old >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>posting, >>>>>>>>>>> reach: >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ai mailing
>>>>list >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Disclaimer: >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise,
>>>>reflect the >>>>>>>>>> thinking >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>of >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> person sending the
>>>>mail and AI in no way relates itself to
>>>>its >>>>>>>>>> veracity; >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>2. AI cannot be held liable for any
>>>>commission/omission based on >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>the >>>>>>>>>> mails >>>>>>>>>> sent through
>>>>this mailing
>>>>list.. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > To check if the post reached the list or to
>>>>search for old >>>>>>>>>> posting, >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>reach: >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ai mailing
>>>>list >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>-- >>>>>>>>> Rahul Kelapure >>>>>>>>> +91 9404
>>>>123454 >>>>>>>>> Disclaimer: >>>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise,
>>>>reflect the >>>>>>>>> thinking >>>>>>>>>
>>>>of >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> person sending the
>>>>mail and AI in no way relates itself to
>>>>its >>>>>>>>> veracity; >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2.
>>>>AI cannot be held liable for any
>>>>commission/omission based on >>>>>>>>>
>>>>the >>>>>>>>> mails >>>>>>>>> sent through this
>>>>mailing
>>>>list.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>To check if the post reached the list or to
>>>>search for old posting, >>>>>>>>>
>>>>reach: >>>>>>>>>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ai mailing
>>>>list >>>>>>>>>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>>>>>>>>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Disclaimer: >>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise,
>>>>reflect the >>>>>>>> thinking >>>>>>>>
>>>>of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> person sending the mail
>>>>and AI in no way relates itself to its >>>>>>>>
>>>>veracity; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2. AI cannot be held
>>>>liable for any commission/omission based on
>>>>the >>>>>>>> mails >>>>>>>> sent through this
>>>>mailing
>>>>list.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To
>>>>check if the post reached the list or to search
>>>>for old posting, >>>>>>>> reach: >>>>>>>>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ai mailing
>>>>list >>>>>>>>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>>>>>>>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>
>>>>Avinash Shahi >>>>>>> Doctoral student at Centre
>>>>for Law and Governance JNU >>>>>>>
>>>>Disclaimer: >>>>>>> 1. Contents of the mails,
>>>>factual, or otherwise, reflect the
>>>>thinking >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> person
>>>>sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself
>>>>to its >>>>>>> veracity; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2. AI
>>>>cannot be held liable for any
>>>>commission/omission based on the >>>>>>>
>>>>mails >>>>>>> sent through this mailing
>>>>list.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To check
>>>>if the post reached the list or to search for
>>>>old posting, >>>>>>> reach: >>>>>>>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ai mailing list >>>>>>>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>>>>>>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Disclaimer: >>>>>> 1. Contents
>>>>of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the
>>>>thinking >>>>>> of >>>>>> the >>>>>> person
>>>>sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself
>>>>to its >>>>>> veracity; >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. AI
>>>>cannot be held liable for any
>>>>commission/omission based on the >>>>>>
>>>>mails >>>>>> sent through this mailing
>>>>list.. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> To check if
>>>>the post reached the list or to search for old
>>>>posting, >>>>>> reach: >>>>>>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ai mailing list >>>>>>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>>>>>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Vivek
>>>>Doddamani Ph-9868954833 & 08860410944  skype:
>>>>vivek.doddamani, >>>>> FB: vivek
>>>>doddamani.  105, Lancer Road, Near Mall Road,
>>>>Delhi-110054. >>>>> Disclaimer: >>>>> 1.
>>>>Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise,
>>>>reflect the thinking >>>>> of >>>>> the >>>>>
>>>>person sending the mail and AI in no way relates
>>>>itself to its >>>>> veracity; >>>>> >>>>> 2. AI
>>>>cannot be held liable for any
>>>>commission/omission based on the >>>>>
>>>>mails >>>>> sent through this mailing
>>>>list.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To check if the
>>>>post reached the list or to search for old
>>>>posting, >>>>> reach: >>>>>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ai mailing list >>>>>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>>>>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks and
>>>>Regards >>>> Swati Saxena >>>> MA in Human
>>>>Resource Management & Labor Relations >>>> Batch
>>>>of 2012-2014 >>>> Tata Institute of Social
>>>>Sciences >>>> Mumbai, India >>>>
>>>>Disclaimer: >>>> 1. Contents of the mails,
>>>>factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking
>>>>of >>>> the >>>> person sending the mail and AI
>>>>in no way relates itself to its
>>>>veracity; >>>> >>>> 2. AI cannot be held liable
>>>>for any commission/omission based on the >>>>
>>>>mails >>>> sent through this mailing
>>>>list.. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To check if the post
>>>>reached the list or to search for old
>>>>posting, >>>> reach: >>>>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> >>> >>>> >>>> Ai mailing list >>>>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>>>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >>>> Disclaimer: >>>> 1. Contents of the mails,
>>>>factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking
>>>>of >>>> the >>>> person sending the mail and AI
>>>>in no way relates itself to its
>>>>veracity; >>>> >>>> 2. AI cannot be held liable
>>>>for any commission/omission based on the >>>>
>>>>mails >>>> sent through this mailing
>>>>list.. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To check if the post
>>>>reached the list or to search for old
>>>>posting, >>>> reach: >>>>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> >>> >>>> >>>> Ai mailing list >>>>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>>>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >>>> >>> Disclaimer: >>> 1. Contents of the
>>>>mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the
>>>>thinking of >>> the person sending the mail and
>>>>AI in no way relates itself to its >>>
>>>>veracity; >>> >>> 2. AI cannot be held liable
>>>>for any commission/omission based on the >>>
>>>>mails >>> >>> sent through this mailing
>>>>list.. >>> >>> >>> >>> To check if the post
>>>>reached the list or to search for old
>>>>posting, >>> reach: >>>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> >> >>> >>> Ai mailing list >>>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >>> >> >> Disclaimer: >> 1. Contents of the
>>>>mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the
>>>>thinking of >> the >> person sending the mail
>>>>and AI in no way relates itself to its
>>>>veracity; >> >> 2. AI cannot be held liable for
>>>>any commission/omission based on the mails >>
>>>>sent through this mailing list.. >> >> >> >> To
>>>>check if the post reached the list or to search
>>>>for old posting, reach: >>
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>> > >> >> Ai mailing list >>
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> >> > > > -- > Thanks and Regards > Swati
>>>>Saxena > MA in Human Resource Management & Labor
>>>>Relations > Batch of 2012-2014 > Tata Institute
>>>>of Social Sciences > Mumbai, India >
>>>>Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual,
>>>>or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the >
>>>>person sending the mail and AI in no way relates
>>>>itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held
>>>>liable for any commission/omission based on the
>>>>mails > sent through this mailing list.. > > > >
>>>>To check if the post reached the list or to
>>>>search for old posting, reach: >
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>_______________________________________________ >
>>>>  > > Ai mailing list >
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>> > -- Vivek Doddamani Ph-9868954833 &
>>>>08860410944  skype: vivek.doddamani, FB: vivek
>>>>doddamani.  105, Lancer Road, Near Mall Road,
>>>>Delhi-110054. Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the
>>>>mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the
>>>>thinking of the person sending the mail and AI
>>>>in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI
>>>>cannot be held liable for any
>>>>commission/omission based on the mails sent
>>>>through this mailing list.. To check if the post
>>>>reached the list or to search for old posting,
>>>>reach:
>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Ai mailing list
>>>>Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in
>>>>http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> with warm regards
>>> Mahendra Galani
>>> Whatsapp/Viber/Skype/Imo/Facetime +43 699 174 555 95
>>> Festnetz +43 1 961 77 47
>>> Addresse, Arneth gasse 45/2/2
>>> 1160 Vienna, Austria, Europe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Disclaimer:
>>> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of
>>> the
>>> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
>>>
>>> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the
>>> mails
>>> sent through this mailing list..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting,
>>> reach:
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>> Ai mailing list
>>> Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in
>>> http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vivek Doddamani Ph-9868954833 & 08860410944  skype: vivek.doddamani,
>> FB: vivek doddamani.  105, Lancer Road, Near Mall Road, Delhi-110054.
>> Disclaimer:
>> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of
>> the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its
>> veracity;
>>
>> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails
>>
>> sent through this mailing list..
>>
>>
>>
>> To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>> Ai mailing list
>> Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in
>> http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>
>
> Disclaimer:
> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the
> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
>
> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails
> sent through this mailing list..
>
>
>
> To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> Ai mailing list
> Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in
> http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
>


-- 
we want peace not pieces.
regards,
Danish Mahajan
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..



To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach:
https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
_______________________________________________


Ai mailing list
Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in
http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai

Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..



To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach:
https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html
_______________________________________________


Ai mailing list
Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in
http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai

Reply via email to