On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Christopher Adams <[email protected]>wrote:
> I'm not seeing consensus on this yet. > > In HTML head & is not okay but & is? Doesn't & contain &? What item > in the W3 recommendations are you referring to? I'd like to read it. > > I also don't understand the point about & and > That seems like two > different issues to me. > > I'd like the URL to be valid HTML. I'd also like to be able to view the CSS > link directly a web browser without having to perform a search–replace on > it. > > If it is of any use, I support this stance. Valid HTML is a helpful and good thing. Non valid HTML means hacks that usually are un-necessary. > - Christopher > > Cheers Chovynz
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~aikiframework-devel Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~aikiframework-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
