On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:18:19 +0800 Jon Phillips <j...@fabricatorz.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jakub Jankiewicz <jcu...@onet.pl> > wrote: > > There are 3 language system L10N (aiki_dictionary) Getext using > > files for upgrader and installer and new system use in Aiki > > (aiki_dictionaries). > > Sure, I documented these in this document. > > > but there is bug in that that should be fixed, > > > > languages in Aiki_sites is like tags on OCAL, it's bad, every > > language should be in separated row in its own table > > Ok, can you file that to be fixed then? Until then, we will keep using > it. Need a bug, and action to support this effort. I can make aiki_languages to be use by new system created by Roger, so it will make sense to add all languages, otherwise it will be a waste of time. > > > > there is aiki_languages but I think it's not use by new language > > system, we should remove old L10N code and use aiki_languages in new > > one. > > That is a waste of time to remove that at this point. Roger > architected the new system to work in co-existence, so leave it. The > aiki_languages is used as a template for what languages exist, and > also are used in rendering the pages for language direction, etc. > Please instead, add all the UTF-8 languages and their directions as I > asked last week. Can you please complete this task as soon as > possible? It's waste that we have dead code. and for what template, si the same as you put those languages into a wiki, in both cases the code will not use it. > > > and also there is no relation between languages and translations, > > it's relational database, and there need to be connection > > > Languages are site based so there will be need for site_id in > > aiki_languages. > > Ok, can you come up with a bug and plan to make this happen then? We > need action on this. We will need to make aiki_languages to be actually use by new code, https://bugs.launchpad.net/aikiframework/+bug/1014970 > > > Right now you can put "foo" into aiki_dictionaries as language, and > > database will not complain, the whole idea about relation between > > table is because database will guard integrity of database, and > > right now in Aiki there are not relations at all (no foreign keys) > > Ok, sure, yes, please make a plan on how to fix this then! > > Jon > > -- www: http://jcubic.pl twitter: http://twitter.com/jcubic blog: http://jcubic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~aikiframework-devel Post to : aikiframework-devel@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~aikiframework-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
