Well, other than the fact that I've never used CVS (I'm a subversion guy)
and Nant before, no.  But I guess I'll have to learn and build them myself,
no biggie.

I was mainly concerned with maintainability and having to rebuild/resign
every Alchemi release.

Thanks,
-Matt


On 12/11/06, Anton Melser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/12/06, Matt Valerio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I've been doing some framework development and have been using the
> Alchemi
> > library as a dependency for some time.  Recently (for a number of
> reasons)
> > I've needed to switch from XCopy deployment to GAC deployment.  Thing
> is, I
> > can't add my assembly to the GAC because it doesn't have a strong
> name.  So
> > I sign the assembly, but it still won't add it to the GAC because a
> > dependency (Alchemi.Core.dll) is not strongly signed.
> >
> > I'm still using 1.0.5.  Are the 1.0.6 DLLs signed?
> >
> > Thanks for any help,
>
> Any reason why you don't compile for yourself? That way you can sign
> all you like...
> Cheers
> Antoine
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Alchemi-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alchemi-developers

Reply via email to