On 8/29/01 11:20 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason van Zyl >> >> Sorry, I don't know which Victor you're talking about :-) > > Sorry, s/Victor/Vincent Massol/ >\ Ah, I should have known. I definitely think he should be allowed to maintain the cactus descriptor. I say we move the descriptors into a separate repo. > - Sam Ruby > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate project? Sam Ruby
- RE: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... John Morrison
- Re: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separat... Jason van Zyl
- Re: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... Jason van Zyl
- Re: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... Sam Ruby
- Re: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... Jason van Zyl
- Re: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... Vincent Massol
- RE: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... John Morrison
- Re: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... josh lucas
- Re: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... josh lucas
- Re: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... Scott Sanders
- RE: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... John Morrison
- RE: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate pr... Administrator
