On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 08:10, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On 8/29/01 10:22 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > First my thoughts - should Alexandria look like it was going to go into a
> > long term hibernation again, I would say yes. Otherwise - as long as it
> > looks like there is a hope that Alexandria would subsume the functionally
> > included by Gump, I would prefer it stay here.
>
> I would like it to stay too, I think the inter-project build and continuous
> integration ideas are ones that belong in alexandria.
>
> > Josh's joining the project rekindles the hope that Alexandria will live on.
> >
> > Follow-on question: Victor has expressed an interest in maintaining his own
> > project defintions.
>
> Sorry, I don't know which Victor you're talking about :-)
>
> > I'm inclined to put this to a vote, and indicate my
> > support. This is related to the question above as the level of granularity
> > for karma is at the cvs module level. Thoughts?
>
> I think any project that wants to maintain their descriptor should be free
> to do so. How about putting the descriptors themselves in a separate
> repository and allow access to anyone on a project that requests it?
>
+1 on a separate repository.
josh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
