El Jueves, 15 de Febrero de 2007 00:10, Matthew Burgess escribió: > As you know, currently jhalfs applies a workaround of > passing "SHELL=/bin/bash" to `make' so that progressbar.sh and the unpack > commands, which contain bashisms, work properly. The problem I have with > this is that by doing this, the environment is different to that which is > explicitly defined in the LFS book, hence jhalfs diverges from the commands > in LFS and therefore can't be trusted as a mechanism to test the book out > with. If it hadn't have been setting SHELL, I'd have seen the whole glibc > vs. dash problem first-hand and could have gotten the book fixed up sooner.
The thread that driver us to add SHELL=/bin/bash start here: http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/alfs-discuss/2006-November/009008.html I need to re-read it also and now is very late for me to do it. Lets start the discussion to find the best solution for that. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
