M.Canales.es wrote: > El Jueves, 15 de Febrero de 2007 00:10, Matthew Burgess escribió: > >> As you know, currently jhalfs applies a workaround of >> passing "SHELL=/bin/bash" to `make' so that progressbar.sh and the unpack >> commands, which contain bashisms, work properly. The problem I have with >> this is that by doing this, the environment is different to that which is >> explicitly defined in the LFS book, hence jhalfs diverges from the commands >> in LFS and therefore can't be trusted as a mechanism to test the book out >> with. If it hadn't have been setting SHELL, I'd have seen the whole glibc >> vs. dash problem first-hand and could have gotten the book fixed up sooner. > > The thread that driver us to add SHELL=/bin/bash start here: > > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/alfs-discuss/2006-November/009008.html > > I need to re-read it also and now is very late for me to do it. Lets start > the > discussion to find the best solution for that. > > Most of the changes I made were for the pretty stuff. Dash does not have 'echo -e' and the 'time' function does not work like the Bash version. Therefore I had to force bash to be the shell.
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
