Hi,
But in your second while( ) loop when the check 'root->left = NULL'
executes 'root' is already NULL, because only then the first loop
terminates. So you need to insert the following statement inbetween the
loops
root = pop( )
Also your solution assumes that the value at the nodes are of 'single
character'. Say, if the values are of multiple character strings, then
instead of 'string_reverse( )' the function 'reverse_words_in_string( )'.
Other than this the solution should be perfect. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks and Regards,
K.V.Chandra Kumar.
On 07/09/2007, anshu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> An alternative algorithm that works without the explored() function
> could be as under.
> Just written a rough algorithm, there are a few more optimizations in
> loop possible,..
> The basi idea used here is -
> Post order mean "Data-Left-Right"
> If pre-order algorithm be executed with the difference that instead of
> left we explore right.
> The final order obtained when reversed will give post order.
>
>
> post_order(root)
> {
> string_reverse( func(root));
> }
>
>
> func(root)
> {
> do {
> while(root != NULL)
> {
> print(root->data);
> push(root);
> root=root->right;
> }
> while( root->left=NULL || stack ! empty)
> root=pop()
> if(root->left !=NULL)
> {
> root=root->left
> }
>
> }while( stack ! empty);
>
> }
>
>
> On Aug 28, 8:39 am, "chandra kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Need more details about explored( Node * ) function,
> >
> > Consider the "NULL" input
> >
> > if your explored( NULL ) returns "true" then I guess that every
> thing
> > works fine, and also most of your checks could be eliminated ( code will
> > become simpler )
> > if your explored( NULL ) returns "false", then the same case as in
> my
> > previous mail will result in wrong answer.
> > * if((s->left == null && s->right==null)
> > ||(explored(s->left)&&explored(s->right)) *
> > * ---as s->left == null && explored( s->right ) ( and vice
> versa
> > are not there )*
> >
> > Correct me if I'm wrong.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > K.V.Chandra Kumar.
> >
> > On 28/08/07, MD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I think first s=pop() in while is not the right approach. This is an
> > > alternate approach where explored() checks if the node is visited or
> > > not... hence discarding that path.. and I think the following handles
> > > the null conditions as well.. (ex given by chandra)
> >
> > > void postOrderTraversal(Tree *root)
> > > {
> > > node * previous = null;
> > > node * s = root;
> > > push(s);
> >
> > > while( stack is not empty)
> > > {
> > > if(s->left && !explored(s->left)) //explored check if the node was
> > > previously visited
> > > {push(s->left);
> > > s=s->left}
> > > else
> > > {if(s->right && !explored(s->right))
> > > {push(s->right);
> > > s=s->right;}
> > > }
> >
> > > if((s->left == null && s->right==null) ||(explored(s-
> > > >left)&&explored(s->right)) //last level-child or both childern are
> > > explored
> > > { s = pop(); //
> > > print(s->data);
> > > s= pop(); //POP Again....point s to next element.
> > > }
> > > }//end of while
> >
> > > }
> >
> > > On Aug 24, 6:17 am, "Phani Kumar Ch. V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> >
> > > > Please let me know if this pseudo code gives correct solution for
> > > iterative
> > > > post-order traversal of a binary tree.
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > > void postOrderTraversal(Tree *root)
> > > > {
> > > > node * previous = null;
> > > > node * s = null;
> > > > push(root);
> > > > while( stack is not empty )
> > > > {
> > > > s = pop();
> >
> > > > if(s->right == null and s->left == null)
> > > > {
> > > > previous = s;
> > > > process node s;
> > > > }
> > > > else
> > > > {
> > > > if( s->right == previous or s->left == previous )
> > > > {
> > > > previous = s;
> > > > process node s;
> > > > }
> > > > else
> > > > {
> > > > push( s );
> > > > if(s->right) { push(s->right); }
> > > > if(s->left) { push(s->left); }
> > > > }
> > > > }}
> >
> > > > -----------------------
> > > > Regards
> > > > Phani
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
