>>Given value you can easily find the key using hash function it self
Maybe you mean if you have the hash value of the key?
But it is different than value which is stored in the hashtable?



On Mar 27, 9:39 am, "phani bandaru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given value you can easily find the key using hash function it self.-
> Find2(v)
> If we just have one hash table, that is enough to do the first two
> operations. Insert & Find1
>
> On 3/27/08, Sticker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I was interviewed a question about implementing a bi-direction
> > hashtable, i.e. a hashtable that stores key-value pairs such that you
> > can find value based on key as well as find key based on value.
>
> > In another word, there is no obvious difference between a key and a
> > value, your hashtable should have the following functions:
> > 1. Insert(v1, v2); //Insert v1-v2 pair.
> > 2. Find1(v);  //Find v2 based on v1. Should take O(1) time.
> > 3. Find2(v);  //Find v1 based on v2. Should take O(1) time.
>
> > My answer at that time was using two hashtables underlying, one treats
> > v1 as key and v2 as value and the other treats v2 as key and v1 as
> > value.
>
> > In this way, some redundant information is kept. For example, by
> > removing v1-v2 pair, we need to remove v1 from on hashtable and v2
> > from the other.
>
> > I wonder whether there is alternate way that store v1-v2 pair as a
> > whole and meanwhile allows quick search based on both v1 and v2.
>
> > Many thanks.
>
> --
> pUrNamadah pUrNamidam
> pUrNAt pUrNamudachyate
> pUrNasya pUrNamAdAya
> pUrNamevAvashiShyate
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to