u can find the solution to this puzzle here...

http://gurmeetsingh.wordpress.com/2009/08/21/puzzle-whats-the-number-on-my-hat/



On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Nikhil Jindal <fundoon...@yahoo.co.in>wrote:

> Again for ur soln, if n is 2 and the numbers are : 2,1
> None of them is correct.
>
> My soln was in probabilistic terms. The probability of choosing a number x
> from 1 to N is 1/N, however you can give an example where you choose N
> numbers without choosing x at all. That is not the right way :)
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:02 AM, manoj janoti <m.jan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If all the men gusses the same number then the solution could be wrong.
>>
>> for example the the value of N is 5 and numbers given are 1,2,1,1,1 and
>> everybody guesses 4 then the solution is wrong.
>>
>> A different solution is like - All men will stand in a row and and
>> everybody can think of his hat number as his position in row.
>>
>> In this way atleast one person will be there who is correct.
>>
>> Manoj Janoti
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Nikhil Jindal <fundoon...@yahoo.co.in>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> Since duplicates are allowed, the fact that I can see the number on
>>> others hat is of no significance to me. My guess with this information is as
>>> good without it.
>>>
>>> Hence, I will consider the situation as:
>>> I am sitting alone in a dark room and I am given a hat with a number from
>>> 1 to N. I have to guess the number on my hat.
>>> I am in such a situation N times and I have to develop a strategy for
>>> guessing such that I am correct atleast once.
>>> Now if I guess a number x (1<=x<=N), my probability of correctness is 1/N
>>> i.e if I guess the same number N times, I will be correct once.
>>> Hence I guess the same number every time.
>>>
>>> For the given puzzle, all men guess the same number and at least one of
>>> them will be correct. :)
>>>
>>> Nikhil Jindal
>>> Department of Computer Engineering
>>> Delhi College of Engineering <http://www.dce.edu>, Delhi
>>> My Blog: http://fundoonick.blogspot.com
>>> My LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/nikhiljindal
>>>
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/nikhiljindal>
>>> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Dave <dave_and_da...@juno.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> But everyone guesses simultaneously. I take it to mean that no one
>>>> knows anyone else's guess when making his own.
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 4, 2:01 am, agnibha nath <agni.fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > can it be like... one person sees any other person's number and
>>>> > guesses it first. then, everybody else guesses the same number. this
>>>> > way, atleast one guesses it right, since there is no boundation on the
>>>> > no. of wrong guesses.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Jul 3, 11:10 pm, jalaj jaiswal <jalaj.jaiswa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > N people team up and decide on a strategy for playing this game.
>>>> Then they
>>>> > > walk into a room. On entry to the room, each person is given a hat
>>>> on which
>>>> > > one of the first N natural numbers is written. There may be
>>>> duplicate hat
>>>> > > numbers. For example, for N=3, the 3 team members may get hats
>>>> labeled 2, 1,
>>>> > > 2. Each person can see the numbers written on the others' hats, but
>>>> does not
>>>> > > know the number written on his own hat. Every person then
>>>> simultaneously
>>>> > > guesses the number of his own hat. What strategy can the team follow
>>>> to make
>>>> > > sure that at least one person on the team guesses his hat number
>>>> correctly?
>>>> > > --
>>>> >
>>>> > > With Regards,
>>>> > > Jalaj Jaiswal
>>>> > > +919026283397
>>>> > > B.TECH IT
>>>> > > IIIT ALLAHABAD- Hide quoted text -
>>>> >
>>>> > - Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic 
>>> communications disclaimer: 
>>> http://dce.edu/web/Sections/Standalone/Email_Disclaimer.php
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>>
>>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> <algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>>>
>>>
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic 
> communications disclaimer: 
> http://dce.edu/web/Sections/Standalone/Email_Disclaimer.php
>
>
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>
>
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to