@Gene: Thanks alot! :-) your solution works like charm!

On Aug 28, 7:09 am, Gene <gene.ress...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a nice problem.  It looks like a trivial matroid, so a greedy
> algorithm will work fine.  The obvious greedy algorithm is to work
> left-to-right and incorporate elements into the sorted order one-by-
> one.  In each case, you have 2 choices.  The first is to decrement
> elements to the left by the amount needed to restore non-decreasing
> order.  The second is to delete the new element.  The cost of each is
> easy to calculate.  Pick the choice with least cost and continue.
> This algorithm is O(n^2).  There may be a faster way to do it, but I
> can't see one.
>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> int make_nondecreasing(int *a, int n)
> {
>   int i, j, dec, dec_cost, total_cost;
>
>   total_cost = 0;
>   for (i = 0; i < n - 1; i++) {
>
>     // If we find a decrease...
>     if (a[i] > a[i + 1]) {
>
>       // Find cost of decrementing all to the left.
>       dec_cost = dec = a[i] - a[i + 1];
>       for (j = i - 1; j >= 0; j--) {
>
>         // Find decrement that would be needed.
>         dec += a[j] - a[j + 1];
>
>         // If no decement, we're done.
>         if (dec <= 0)
>           break;
>
>         // Count cost of decrement.
>         dec_cost += dec;
>       }
>
>       // Compare decrement cost with deletion cost.
>       if (dec_cost < a[i + 1]) {
>
>         // Decrement is cheaper.  Do it.
>         for (j = i; j >= 0; j--) {
>           if (a[j] > a[i + 1])
>             a[j] = a[i + 1];
>         }
>         total_cost += dec_cost;
>       }
>       else {
>
>         // Deletion is cheaper.  Do it.
>         total_cost += a[i + 1];
>         for (j = i + 1; j < n - 1; j++)
>           a[j] = a[j + 1];
>         --n;
>       }
>     }
>   }
>   return total_cost;
>
> }
>
> int main(void)
> {
>   int a[] = { 14, 15, 16, 13, 11, 18 };
>   //int a[] = { 4, 3, 5, 6};
>   //int a[] = { 10, 3, 11, 12 };
>   int cost = make_nondecreasing(a, sizeof a / sizeof a[0]);
>   printf("cost=%d\n", cost);
>   return 0;
>
> }
>
> On Aug 27, 12:15 pm, jagadish <jagadish1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You are given an array of positive integers. Convert it to a sorted
> > array with minimum cost. Only valid operation are
> > 1) Decrement -> cost = 1
> > 2) Delete an element completely from the array -> cost = value of
> > element
>
> > For example:
> > 4,3,5,6, -> cost 1
> > 10,3,11,12 -> cost 3

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to