Dave - Can you elaborate on how you can do this - "you can determine
whether the low order bit of the missing number is 0 or 1"

On Jun 26, 2:32 pm, Kamakshii Aggarwal <kamakshi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> thanks dave..
>
> On 6/26/11, Dave <dave_and_da...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > @Kamakshii: In O(n), you can determine whether the low order bit of
> > the missing number is 0 or 1. You can eliminate the approximately n/2
> > numbers that do not have this low order bit. Then, in O(n/2), you can
> > determine the next-to-low order bit. Etc. O(n) + O(n/2) + O(n/4) + ...
> > = O(n).
>
> > Dave
>
> > On Jun 26, 2:41 am, Kamakshii Aggarwal <kamakshi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> @dave:can u please give the divide and conquer solution
>
> >> On 6/26/11, Kamakshii Aggarwal <kamakshi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > @aditya:it is given in the question that u cannot access the entire
> >> > element in single operaion..therefore both your above solution do not
> >> > hold for this question.
>
> >> > On 6/25/11, sunny agrawal <sunny816.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> @Dave
> >> >> yes u r right that integers means it can be big integers too.
> >> >> generally when we talk about integers, they are 32 bit integers in
> >> >> Programing/Algorithm Questions
> >> >> so i was assuming that here
>
> >> >> and about my solution - yes it will be O(nlgn) or O(nw) not acceptable
> >> >> for
> >> >> given Q :(
>
> >> >> and yes a Divide and Conquer solution can do it in O(n). I just came to
> >> >> know
> >> >> ..thanks
> >> >> i little bit similer to my approach............Nice One
>
> >> >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Dave <dave_and_da...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> >> >>> @Sunny. You are reading too much into that. There is no mention that
> >> >>> the data are 32-bit integers. Perhaps they are big integers. What we
> >> >>> know is that the data are not characters, real numbers, rational
> >> >>> numbers, floating point, etc.
>
> >> >>> Your algorithm is O(n*w), where w is the word size. As I said, a
> >> >>> divide-and-conquer algorithm can find the missing number in O(n).
> >> >>> Furthermore, this is independent of the word size.
>
> >> >>> Dave
>
> >> >>> On Jun 24, 11:44 pm, sunny agrawal <sunny816.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > @Dave it is given in Question that elements of array are integer
>
> >> >>> > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Dave <dave_and_da...@juno.com>
> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> > > @Sunny: What makes you think that the integers are 32 bits in
> >> >>> > > length.
> >> >>> > > Remember that O(.) notation applies as n --> infinity. Thus, O(n
> >> >>> > > log
> >> >>> > > n) is correct for a naive algorithm. But a little thought can give
> >> >>> > > a
> >> >>> > > divide-and-conquer algorithm which is O(n).
>
> >> >>> > > Dave
>
> >> >>> > > On Jun 24, 8:44 am, sunny agrawal <sunny816.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > > > hmm i also doubt that
> >> >>> > > > but it is Strictly O(32n) not O(nlgn) where lgn <= 32 depending
> >> >>> > > > upon
> >> >>> > > value
> >> >>> > > > of n
>
> >> >>> > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:10 PM, rizwan hudda
> >> >>> > > > <rizwanhu...@gmail.com
>
> >> >>> > > wrote:
> >> >>> > > > > @sunny: Think again, your solution will take O(n*log(n)),
> >> >>> > > > > where
> >> >>> log(n)
> >> >>> > > is
> >> >>> > > > > the number of bits to represent
> >> >>> > > > > the number.
>
> >> >>> > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Sriganesh Krishnan <
> >> >>> 2448...@gmail.com
> >> >>> > > >wrote:
>
> >> >>> > > > >> can you explain me....what the logic is...behind the xor
> >> >>> > > operation?...is
> >> >>> > > > >> it like inversion or encryption?
>
> >> >>> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:59 AM, sunny agrawal <
> >> >>> > > sunny816.i...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> >>> > > > >>> initially compute xor of all the values from 0 to n in a
> >> >>> > > > >>> variable
> >> >>> > > Temp
> >> >>> > > > >>> so temp = 0^1^2........^n
> >> >>> > > > >>> let result is used to store the missing number
> >> >>> > > > >>> for each ith bit of missing number where i = 0-31 we can
> >> >>> > > > >>> find
> >> >>> > > > >>> it
> >> >>> as
> >> >>> > > > >>> following
> >> >>> > > > >>> ith bit of result = (xor of all ith bits of values of array)
> >> >>> xored
> >> >>> > > with
> >> >>> > > > >>> (ith
> >> >>> > > > >>> bit of temp)
>
> >> >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:25 AM, oppilas . <
> >> >>> > > jatka.oppimi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> >>> > > > >>>> Is the array sorted?
> >> >>> > > > >>>> In A[1..n], one number is missing from 0 to N. So,
> >> >>> > > > >>>> A[5]={--INF, 2,1,3,0} is a valid case?
>
> >> >>> > > > >>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:51 PM, RollBack <
> >> >>> rajeevr...@gmail.com
> >> >>> > > >wrote:
>
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> An array A[1...n] contains all the integers from 0 to n
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> except
> >> >>> for
> >> >>> > > one
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> number which is
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> missing. In this problem, we cannot access an entire
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> integer
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> in
> >> >>> A
> >> >>> > > with
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> a single opera-
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> tion. The elements of A are represented in binary, and the
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> only
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> operation we can use
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> to access them is “fetch the jth bit of A[i]”, which takes
> >> >>> constant
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> time. Write code to
> >> >>> > > > >>>>>   find the missing integer. Can you do it in O(n) time?
> >> >>> > > > >>>>>  _
> >> >>> > > > >>>>>  _ _____________________________________________
>
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> Rajeev N Bharshetty
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> I Blog @www.opensourcemania.co.cc
>
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> --
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> the
> >> >>> Google
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> To post to this group, send email to
> >> >>> algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> > > > >>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >> >>> > > > >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> >> >>> > > > >>>>  --
> >> >>> > > > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> >>> Google
> >> >>> > > > >>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> >>> > > > >>>> To post to this group, send email to
> >> >>> > > > >>>> algogeeks@googlegroups.com
> >> >>> .
> >> >>> > > > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >>> > > > >>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> > > > >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >> >>> > > > >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> >> >>> > > > >>> --
> >> >>> > > > >>> Sunny Aggrawal
> >> >>> > > > >>> B-Tech IV year,CSI
> >> >>> > > > >>> Indian Institute Of Technology,Roorkee
>
> >> >>> > > > >>>  --
> >> >>> > > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> >>> Google
> >> >>> > > Groups
> >> >>> > > > >>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> >>> > > > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> >> >>> > > > >>> algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> > > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >>> > > > >>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> > > > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >> >>> > > > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> >> >>> > > > >>  --
> >> >>> > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> >>> > > > >> Google
> >> >>> > > Groups
> >> >>> > > > >> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> >>> > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> >> >>> > > > >> algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >>> > > > >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> > > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> >>> > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> >> >>> > > > > --
> >> >>> > > > > Thanks and regards
> >> >>> > > > > Rizwan A Hudda
> >> >>> > > > >http://sites.google.com/site/rizwanhudda
>
> >> >>> > > > >  --
> >> >>> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> >>> > > > > Google
> >> >>> > > Groups
> >> >>> > > > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> >>> > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> >> >>> > > > > algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >>> > > > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> >> >>> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> >> >>> > > > --
> >> >>> > > > Sunny Aggrawal
> >> >>> > > > B-Tech IV year,CSI
> >> >>> > > > Indian Institute Of Technology,Roorkee- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >>> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >>> > > --
> >> >>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> >>> Groups
> >> >>> > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> >>> > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >>> > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> > > For more options, visit this group at
> >> >>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> >> >>> > --
> >> >>> > Sunny Aggrawal
> >> >>> > B-Tech IV year,CSI
> >> >>> > Indian Institute Of Technology,Roorkee- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >>> > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> >>> Groups
> >> >>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> >>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Sunny Aggrawal
> >> >> B-Tech IV year,CSI
> >> >> Indian Institute Of Technology,Roorkee
>
> >> >> --
> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> >> Groups
> >> >> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> >> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> >> > --
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Kamakshi
> >> > kamakshi...@gmail.com
>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Kamakshi
> >> kamakshi...@gmail.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > You received
>
> ...
>
> read more »

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to