@Rizwan:
don't u think for the counting sort part, if u use 11 int array as it
is without copying values in the main array, it would run faster? And
later on, get the sum from the two 11 int arrays like I did. Although
m using a single buffer so m getting 0.01. ->http://ideone.com/lsK8n
So, by using a buffer of 512, u might b able to get a time of 0.0.
What do u think?

On Jun 27, 2:05 am, rizwan hudda <rizwanhu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am able to get this accepted with 0.00 Secondshttp://ideone.com/Eg2wZ
> But, I am using 512 KB Buffer. Not sure how I do get 0.00 with a
> smaller buffer size say 8KB
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Wladimir Tavares <wladimir...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> > sometimes using global static variables may be better to use dynamic
> > variables on the stack!
>
> > Sometimes!
>
> > Wladimir Araujo Tavares
> > Federal University of Ceará
>
> > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Dumanshu <duman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> finally got it in 0.01 sec using all the optimizations i am aware of
> >> including what Wladimir had suggested.
> >> Now wat to do for 0.00???
> >> heres my code-
> >>http://ideone.com/lsK8n
>
> >> please suggest if any further optimizations possible.
>
> >> On Jun 26, 2:21 am, Dumanshu <duman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Ok, it seems like bucket sort is the best way to do it.  I got 0.06
> >> > and to go further weneedto use char buffer like the one Wladimir
> >> > suggested.
> >> > But still i have a doubt that would it be possible to reduce 0.06 to
> >> > 0.00 using that buffer?
>
> >> > I don't think there can be any possible improvement in logic.
> >> > wat do u think?
>
> >> > On Jun 26, 12:25 am, Dumanshu <duman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > see i got 0.07 sec as the time after using counting sort.. because the
> >> > > hotness scale is 0-10 so i used an array of 11 ints to count the no.
> >> > > of occurrences. But i m nt able to further reduce this.
> >> > > ny suggestions?
>
> >> > > theres a comment on the problem:
> >> > > On an interesting side note: the maximising principle underlying this
> >> > > problem generalises to almost-everywhere finite functions on sigma-
> >> > > finite measure spaces by a theorem of Hardy and Littlewood, see
> >> > > Theorem II.2.2 in C. Bennett, R. Sharpley, "Interpolation of
> >> > > Operators"
> >> > > ny use???
>
> >> > > On Jun 25, 3:08 pm, prathimzn <prathi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > somebody answer how to reduce time....
> >> > > > *- - - - -
> >> > > > WITH REGARDS,
>
> >> > > > *
> >> > > > *
> >> > > > PRAMENDRA RATHI
> >> > > > *
> >> > > > **
>
> >> > > > *B.TECH 2ND YEAR*
> >> > > > *COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING*
> >> > > > *NIT ALLAHABAD*
>
> >> > > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:27 AM, prathimzn <prathi...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > sorry my time is 0.2 and i use simple int array and sort function
> >> > > > > of
> >> > > > > <algorithm>...
>
> >> > > > > *- - - - -
> >> > > > > WITH REGARDS,
>
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > PRAMENDRA RATHI
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > **
>
> >> > > > > *B.TECH 2ND YEAR*
> >> > > > > *COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING*
> >> > > > > *NIT ALLAHABAD*
>
> >> > > > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:04 AM, sunny agrawal
> >> > > > > <sunny816.i...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> > > > >> i am not sure about this
> >> > > > >> but when i solved this problem using simple scanf, printf and
> >> > > > >> sort
> >> > > > >> function of algorithm library, my time was 0.08 so might be
> >> > > > >> reading the
> >> > > > >> values in character buffer and then parsing then in ints may help
>
> >> > > > >> how did you implemented ?
> >> > > > >> did you implemented your own sort funtion ?
> >> > > > >> which input/output methods you used ?
>
> >> > > > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:23 PM, prathimzn <prathi...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > >> wrote:
>
> >> > > > >>>http://www.spoj.pl/problems/FASHION/
>
> >> > > > >>> i summit this question and my time is 0.02 as i used sorting and
> >> > > > >>> then
> >> > > > >>> multiply corresponding index value and sum them to get ans.
>
> >> > > > >>> but best time is 0.00 and 1.6M in C.
> >> > > > >>> can anyone tell me what is the bestalgoto solve this problem
> >> > > > >>> in 0.00
> >> > > > >>> i.e. bestalgo
>
> >> > > > >>> *
>
> >> > > > >>> - - - - -
> >> > > > >>> WITH REGARDS,
> >> > > > >>> PRAMENDRA RATHI
> >> > > > >>> *
> >> > > > >>> **
> >> > > > >>> *B.TECH 2ND YEAR*
> >> > > > >>> *COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING*
> >> > > > >>> *NIT ALLAHABAD*
>
> >> > > > >>>  --
> >> > > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> > > > >>> Google Groups
> >> > > > >>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> > > > >>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> >> > > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > > > >>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> > > > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >> > > > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> >> > > > >> --
> >> > > > >> Sunny Aggrawal
> >> > > > >> B-Tech IV year,CSI
> >> > > > >> Indian Institute Of Technology,Roorkee
>
> >> > > > >>  --
> >> > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> > > > >> Google Groups
> >> > > > >> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> > > > >> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> >> > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > > > >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> > > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> --
> Thanks and regards
> Rizwan A Huddahttp://sites.google.com/site/rizwanhudda2- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to