if this is simple BST then only preorder will suffice On Sep 24, 10:16 pm, wetheart <gumnaamsm...@yahoo.com> wrote: > You can put the array representation of binary tree directly, with > some obvious modifications ofcourse :) > > On Sep 24, 5:38 pm, asdqwe <ayushgoel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > you can put two traversals of three (inorder, preorder or postorder) > > in the file.. > > Two traversals are enough to dedicate a particular tree. > > > On Sep 24, 4:05 pm, Asit Dhal <lipu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I need to print a binary search tree in file. When I will retrieve the > > > same > > > tree from the file. > > > > I have thought about printing in xml format like this > > > > 100 > > > / \ > > > 50 150 > > > / \ / \ > > > 30 70 120 200 > > > > <Level 0> > > > 100 > > > <Level 1> > > > 50 > > > <Level 2> > > > 30 > > > </Level2> > > > <Level 2> > > > 70 > > > </Level 2> > > > </Level 1> > > > <Level 1> > > > 150 > > > <Level 2> > > > 120 > > > </Level 2> > > > <Level 2> > > > 200 > > > </level 2> > > > </level 1> > > > </level 0> > > > > I don't know will this be the best solution or not. > > > > Please suggest me how to approach it or some better solution. > > > > Regards > > > Asithttp://kodeyard.blogspot.com/
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
