To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 14:15:56 -0800 2005 ------- "2. Adding the freedesktop rpm to epmfile is o.k., but IIRC there is a problem with accessing files from different modules directly. Ause ?" ? the redhat and suse packages are already listed in there so this was the most natural way to go with the freedesktop counterpart. I don't see the problem here... "Until we come up with a meaningful Release number, we should stick with the hardcoded '1' (I think)." But why is there a releasenumber already defined if it is not used? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
