To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53993
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 05:00:04 -0700 2005 ------- Very good. I see that we have a problem. ST may be right. I still think that there should be a statement, in English, that we should get language packs from the NLC of choice. However, there is a problem, the 2.0 language packs are not offered by most NLC projects. They are not put on the mirrors nor downloads.openoffice.org. So we are now at an impass. If those in control will not offer the language packs via the openoffice.org projects, such as oootranslation, then we are obliged to get the packs elsewhere. Where? Well how about hammering Pavel's development server. Not freindly but it will work until ... Please reconsider. Employment of language packs is an important part of the 2.0 Beta process and if these are not tested we will not have a viable product and we are forcing users to do multiple installations of complete 2.0/1.9 suites in other languages than that first downloaded. Think about what you are doing. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
