To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55546
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 31 02:55:00 -0800 2005 ------- er: Eike, could you please have a look at this CWS? Would you agree with the proposed changes of ULONG -> sal_uInt32 for the sake of 64bit porting? The reason for this CWS is that the usage of NumberFormat related functions/variables is inconsistent in the code. mhu: There's no technical reason; just typing (I do not like even sal_uInt32 - it is too long to write as well;-) ) But, AFAIK, sal_uInt32 is the recommended form in the new code, not UINT32 - so I'd like not to introduce SvUINT32Table - it could trepan developers into using INT32 instead of sal_uInt32... So, I'd prefer either 'Svsal_uInt32Table' or 'SvuInt32Table'. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
