To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 03:35:35 -0800 
2005 -------
In message "[Issue 53572]  MinGW port efforts and information for SRC680 
codeline",
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
 > >@tono: in binfilter:

 > >in inc/bf_xmloff/SchXMLExportHelper.hxx the lines:
 > >#ifndef _XMLOFF_PROPERTYSETMAPPER_HXX
 > >#include <bf_xmloff/xmlprmap.hxx>
 > >#endif
 > >are they not mingw port specific only?
 >
 >I have modified it because of a template instantiation problem and I think 
it 
 >it not mingw specific. But it should depend the versions of gcc. It may be 
 >unnecessary in the current gcc version. I will investigate it further.

I have found out your confusion was caused by another lazyness of mine :-P
Actually binfilter/inc/bf_xmloff/SchXMLExportHelper.hxx ALWAYS requires 
binfilter/inc/bf_xmloff/xmlprmap.hxx and it caused a build break in older 
snapshot. That is why I do not enclose it by #ifdef __MINGW32__
However, I have not reported it and this issue was raised by pjanik at i#32707 
and now already fixed by including binfilter/inc/bf_xmloff/xmlprmap.hxx in a 
problematic .cxx file.

Therefore, this modification is no longer needed for thr current source tree. 
(Although it might have been a better solution to i#32707 ... )

tono (Takashi Ono)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to