To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec  2 20:57:40 -0800 
2005 -------
In message "[Issue 53572]  MinGW port efforts and information for SRC680 
codeline",
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
 >@tono: Please, review
 >shell/inc/internal/i_xml_parser_event_handler.hxx : two additional typedef
 >whithout "#ifdef"

"#ifdef should be inserted.
This modification relates to the unicode type and may not be required if I 
change tye definition. In unicode expat, it can be wchar_t and ushort by 
switches. To keep consistency with the current definition, it would be better 
to use wchar_t but if we choose so, the internal expat message becomes unicode 
as well and it requires conversion on errors. Therefore I abandoned to use 
wchar_t here and use casts. These typedefs are intendend to simplify cast 
codes but I think it is not good.

 >moz/mozilla-source-1.7.5.patch: LIB_PREFIX is thrown away. Why? Why just not
 >undefine LIB_PREFIX? Please, review

I would like to use LIB_PREFIX only for import libraries and I think it would 
do no harm for platforms that do not define LIB_PREFIX.

 >svx/source/dialog/makefile.mk: why $(SLO)$/dialmgr.obj is simply thrown away?

I thought that cui shared library is a user of gui library and do not have to 
have duplicate obj. But it does not relates to porting if it is linked 
dynamically. I will eliminate this modification.

 >svx/source/msfilter/mscodec.cxx line 247: this method needs sal_uInt16, 
please
 >convert input data before calling the method. The same is true for
 >svx/inc/mscodec.hxx, line 212

I assumed that this code is intended for unicode string as the code requies 
the input null terminated. But the assumption might have gone too far. I will 
modify as you recommended.

 >dbaccess/source/ui/dlg/makefile.mk line 49: Why not in
 >".IFDEF"?idlc/source/parser.y, lines 129-139. The block is now only for
 >(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER < 1310). Is that your intent?

This chunk of code seems to be no longer needed as stlport 4.5 or later 
includes a header file with malloc.

tono (Takashi Ono)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to