To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62561
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 25 07:00:34 -0800 2006 ------- "Your table must have a primary key" is a workaround (and works), but is not a solution. If my table MUST have a primary key, this must be documented, and it isn't. If my table MUST have a primary key, the choice to do without one must be disabled or intercepted in a sensible way, and it isn't. If my table MUST have a primary key, something is wrong because Base normally accepts tables without a primary key. I can even remove the primary key after creation and everything works as expected, so the primary key is NOT needed and this is really just a workaround. If a feature breaks, we have a regression; if we have a regression, we have a defect. If a widely used feature like this breaks, we have a bad regression; if we have a bad regression, we have a bad defect, hence P2. Setting this as ENHANCEMENT is not quite right: I was asking to restore an existing functionality (OOo 2.0.0 behaves perfectly), not to enhance it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
