To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May  2 08:33:19 -0700 
2006 -------
@panbk: Always using what can be found on the system is nice if you think of OOo
as something which is always build and distributed together with an OS. But
there are more ways to distribute OOo than this. The versions compiled by
Hamburg RE run on any current Linux x86 systems regardless if they bundle
certain libs or not. The only requirement is glibc-2.2.4 or newer (shipped for
instance with the stone old SuSE 7.3 systems). Solaris versions run on Solaris 8
and later. Windows even runs on Windows 98 SE, I think. The customer really
doesn't have to think about if his OS has all depencies fullfilled, it just
works. And this is how it should be. Add to this certain binary compatibility
requirements, you don't really want to shut out 3rd party vendors of components
on the whim.

Of course, distributors like RedHat and Novell, the FreeBSD port teams etc like
to have streamlined versions of OOo wich uses any system shared lib which is
already bundled the OS. Valid request, and so we support both approaches at the
expense of having a slightly lager repository - but that's not something the
customer will see ...

So I would suggest Caolans approach. On the other hand tidying up unused STL
header inclusions is always a good thing, can you extract them from the patch?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to