To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67236
User ace_dent changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'' |'ace_dent' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 11 14:08:29 -0700 2006 ------- Again, 'cheaper' only when displaying images which have been downscaled. Cost is increased decoding complexity when displayed at 1:1 scale (probably not too bad?) and hurts compression. There might be a more optimal pixel size than 128x128- maybe slightly larger? I can provide real world png images for testing and benchmarking if this is useful. Regards, Andrew --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]