To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66722
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 21 04:44:40 -0700 2006 ------- As I said on IRC already ;-) - I don't like the #ifdefs for each and every KDE include (and the need of #defines before #include <sal/kde_headers.hxx>) - and now when I see it, I'm getting even more opposed :-) The common KDE header will be used in just about 10-20 .cxx's, so the compilation time is irrelevant & inclusion of more include files than the minimum is not a problem. But kde_headers.hxx loses readability & is harder to use. Eric arguments that it will force the developers to think more if they really need a class/header or not - but every piece of code goes through IssueZilla & code review anyway - so I think it's not an issue either... sb: I let it on you - decide, please ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
