To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=71057
                 Issue #|71057
                 Summary|Possible exploit potential in openoffice
               Component|framework
                 Version|OOo 2.0.4
                Platform|All
                     URL|
              OS/Version|All
                  Status|UNCONFIRMED
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|DEFECT
                Priority|P3
            Subcomponent|code
             Assigned to|tm
             Reported by|jcdutton





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 31 15:54:20 -0800 
2006 -------
openoffice executable and associated dynamic lib files have executable stack
segments.
scanelf is a tool one can use to find which programs have an executable
stack. For security reasons, and executable stack should be avoided if
at all possible.

scanelf -Rqe /usr/lib/openoffice/*

results in a lot of openoffice having an executable stack.
e.g.
RWX --- ---  /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin

Can openoffice developers take some care so as to avoid this.
It makes exploits so much easier to do in openoffice, and making the
stack only RW- would result in openoffice being a lot more secure.

Some guidelines on how to correct these problems can be found here:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/gnu-stack.xml

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to